Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "N26" to banks with limited history #473

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

alcroito
Copy link
Contributor

@alcroito alcroito commented Oct 5, 2024

No description provided.

@actual-github-bot actual-github-bot bot changed the title Add N26_NTSBDEB1 to banks with limited history [WIP] Add N26_NTSBDEB1 to banks with limited history Oct 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new entry, 'N26_NTSBDEB1', into the BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY array within the src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js file. This addition expands the existing list of banks categorized as having limited history, without altering any other aspects of the code or its structure.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js Added 'N26_NTSBDEB1' to the BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY array.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

::sparkles: Merged

Suggested reviewers

  • jfdoming

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6658dc2 and bf81389.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • upcoming-release-notes/473.md is excluded by !**/*.md
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js (1)

93-93: LGTM. Please provide additional context.

The addition of 'N26_NTSBDEB1' to the BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY array is consistent with the existing entries and doesn't impact the current code structure.

To ensure completeness:

  1. Could you provide more context on why N26 is being added to this list? This information might be valuable for future reference.

  2. If not already present elsewhere, consider adding a comment above the BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY constant explaining its purpose and implications. This would improve code maintainability.

  3. Please ensure any relevant documentation is updated to reflect this addition.

Lastly, as this PR is marked as WIP, please indicate if there are any other planned changes or if this is ready for final review.

✅ Verification successful

Verified addition of 'N26_NTSBDEB1' to BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY

  • The addition is consistent with the documentation in upcoming-release-notes/473.md.
  • No adverse impacts on existing code were found.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if there's an existing comment explaining BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY

# Search for comments mentioning BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY
rg -i "banks.+with.+limited.+history" src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js

# If no results, consider adding a comment
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
    echo "Consider adding a comment explaining BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY"
fi

# Check if N26 is mentioned in README or documentation
rg -i "n26" README.md docs/

Length of output: 208


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if there's an existing comment explaining BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY

# Search for comments mentioning BANKS_WITH_LIMITED_HISTORY
rg -i "banks.+with.+limited.+history" src/app-gocardless/bank-factory.js

# Check if N26 is mentioned in README.md
rg -i "n26" README.md

# Check if docs/ directory exists and search for N26 within it
if [ -d "docs" ]; then
    rg -i "n26" docs/
else
    echo "docs/ directory does not exist. Skipping search within docs/."
fi

# Additionally, search for N26 in other common documentation files
rg -i "n26" CONTRIBUTING.md CHANGELOG.md

Length of output: 439


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Perform a comprehensive search for "n26" across the entire codebase

# Search for "n26" in all files
rg -i "n26"

Length of output: 741


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alcroito alcroito force-pushed the n26_historical_90days branch from fe64dd7 to bf81389 Compare October 5, 2024 11:59
@alcroito alcroito changed the title [WIP] Add N26_NTSBDEB1 to banks with limited history Add "N26" to banks with limited history Oct 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@matt-fidd matt-fidd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants