ci: Do not require codecov anymore for automerge #1652
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
paulgessinger
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2022
benjaminhuth
added
the
Infrastructure
📊 Physics performance monitoring for e7fec6aFull report VertexingIVF seededIVF truth smearedIVF truth estimatedCKFseededtruth smearedtruth estimatedAmbiguity resolutionseededTruth trackingTruth tracking |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1652 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 48.54% 48.54%
=======================================
Files 384 384
Lines 21042 21042
Branches 9693 9693
=======================================
Hits 10214 10214
Misses 4106 4106
Partials 6722 6722 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codecov seems sometimes not update anymore on PRs with
automergelabel, so they never get merged and need to be merged manually in the end...I'm not sure what exactly causes these problems, but I think it would not be to problematic to relax the requirements on this...