Update line-height-not-important-78fd32.md

[tbostic32]

Removed extra "1.5" and changed failed example descriptions from using recommend -> required.

Need for Final Call:

This will require 2 week Final Call - Significant changes to the applicability, expectation, background, and some to the test cases.

---

How to Review And Approve

• Go to the “Files changed” tab
• Here you will have the option to leave comments on different lines.
• Once the review is completed, find the “Review changes” button in the top right, select “Approve” (if you are really confident in the rule) or "Request changes" and click “Submit review”.
• Make sure to also review the proposed Final Call period. In case of disagreement, the longer period wins.

[tbostic32]

@WilcoFiers

In the second part of your comment here #1686 (comment) you mentioned adding another example of using padding to create enough space to pass. I don't think we can do that without changing the expectation; as it is currently written I think it would fail the rule.

Update from ACT TF meeting
We think this rule needs some more major changes, specifically:

• Applicability should be for only multiline text
• Expectation should include scenarios where padding and margin is used to separate lines (satisfy distance requirement)
• Update test cases to reflect changes to expectation

[tbostic32]

Looks like tests are failing because it doesn't like the word unitless (thinks its a misspelling) and the definition of html element is declared but not used.

[Jym77]

Looks like tests are failing because it doesn't like the word unitless (thinks its a misspelling) and the definition of html element is declared but not used.

The unused definitions can simply be removed from the definitions list at the bottom of the file (lines 307 and 315 it seems).
The spelling exception can be added to this file.

[Jym77]

Wondering whether we should have a viewport specified in the Applicability, but I guess I'd like to see what other think about that.

The rest are polishing. So I'm approving now to let other review and give their opinion on the viewport question 👍

Many changes have occured since this approval was granted.

Updated

[WilcoFiers]

Call for review e-mail here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-act-r/2022Jan/0006.html

We forgot to label it. Apologies.