Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tagging - Cache required items check and use uniqueItems #6582

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2018

Conversation

mharis001
Copy link
Member

When merged this pull request will:

  • title

@@ -36,7 +38,6 @@
// Exit if trying to tag a non static object
TRACE_1("Obj:",_intersections);

// Exit if trying to tag a non static object
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why remove?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate comment as above

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤦‍♂️ oof

@PabstMirror PabstMirror added this to the 3.13.0 milestone Sep 21, 2018
@PabstMirror PabstMirror added the kind/enhancement Release Notes: **IMPROVED:** label Sep 21, 2018
@PabstMirror
Copy link
Contributor

Added a commit that ensures _requiredItem is always config-case, should let us drop all the apply {toLower _x}

@PabstMirror PabstMirror merged commit 61000df into acemod:master Sep 21, 2018
@mharis001 mharis001 deleted the optimize-tagging-items branch September 21, 2018 20:50
@PabstMirror PabstMirror modified the milestones: 3.13.0, 3.12.4 Nov 9, 2018
BaerMitUmlaut pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2019
* Cache required items check and use uniqueItems

* Use config-case for required items
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Release Notes: **IMPROVED:**
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants