Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arsenal - Improve armor stat for medical #10561

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LinkIsGrim
Copy link
Contributor

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim commented Dec 17, 2024

When merged this pull request will:

  • Title.
  • Hide GForce stat for most uniforms, which was the code intention.

New stat isn't completely transparent, but it's less misleading (explosive protection is actually ballistic protection because it's armor, yikes).
image

IMPORTANT

  • If the contribution affects the documentation, please include your changes in this pull request so the documentation will appear on the website.
  • Development Guidelines are read, understood and applied.
  • Title of this PR uses our standard template Component - Add|Fix|Improve|Change|Make|Remove {changes}.

@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim added the kind/enhancement Release Notes: **IMPROVED:** label Dec 17, 2024
@LinkIsGrim LinkIsGrim changed the title Arsenal - Improve armor stat for medical, fix gforce stat Arsenal - Improve armor stat for medical Dec 26, 2024
@johnb432
Copy link
Contributor

johnb432 commented Jan 4, 2025

V_PlateCarrierGL_blk is reported to be level IV and V_PlateCarrierSpec_blk to be level V.
However

["V_PlateCarrierGL_blk", "HitChest"] call ace_medical_engine_fnc_getItemArmor
returns
[78,20.252]
and
["V_PlateCarrierSpec_blk", "HitChest"] call ace_medical_engine_fnc_getItemArmor
return
[24,19.8021]

Imo that doesn't feel right.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Release Notes: **IMPROVED:**
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants