Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[hugo-updater] Update Hugo to version 0.139.3 #177

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

abtris
Copy link
Owner

@abtris abtris commented Dec 2, 2024

[hugo-updater] Update Hugo to version 0.139.3
More details in https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/releases/tag/v0.139.3

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded the Hugo version used in the build environment to enhance performance and features.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request involve an update to the netlify.toml configuration file, specifically upgrading the HUGO_VERSION variable from "0.128.2" to "0.139.3". This adjustment reflects the use of a newer version of the Hugo static site generator while maintaining all other build commands and environment settings unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
netlify.toml Updated HUGO_VERSION from "0.128.2" to "0.139.3"

Poem

In the garden of code, a change has bloomed,
With Hugo now fresh, the old version's doomed.
A hop and a skip, to the new we shall go,
With settings intact, watch our site grow! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8f0d71 and 59521e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • netlify.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
netlify.toml (3)

Line range hint 1-28: LGTM! Configuration structure is well-maintained

The overall structure of the Netlify configuration is clean and well-organized, with appropriate settings for different deployment contexts and proper header configurations.


5-5: Verify Hugo version upgrade compatibility

This is a significant version jump from 0.128.2 to 0.139.3. While the change itself is straightforward, it's important to verify compatibility with your site's features and templates.

Let's verify the presence of any Hugo template files that might need attention:

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Review the release notes for any breaking changes
  2. Test the site locally with version 0.139.3 before deploying
  3. Pay special attention to any custom shortcodes or templates
✅ Verification successful

Hugo version upgrade appears safe to proceed

The site uses a standard Hugo configuration with the Academia theme and minimal customizations:

  • No custom shortcodes or partials detected
  • Standard output formats (HTML, RSS, JSON)
  • Basic BlackFriday markdown configuration
  • No complex template overrides

The version upgrade from 0.128.2 to 0.139.3 should be safe as the site uses standard Hugo features without advanced customizations that might be affected by breaking changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Hugo-specific files that might need review after upgrade

# Look for Hugo template files
echo "Checking for Hugo template files..."
fd -e html -e xml -e json --type f "layouts"

# Look for Hugo configuration files
echo "Checking for Hugo config files..."
fd "config" -e toml -e yaml -e json

Length of output: 322


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Hugo configuration files to understand the site's setup
echo "=== Main Hugo Configuration ==="
cat config/_default/config.toml

# Let's also check for any custom layouts or templates
echo -e "\n=== Checking for theme customizations ==="
fd . themes -t d -d 1

# Check for any custom shortcodes
echo -e "\n=== Checking for custom shortcodes ==="
fd . layouts/shortcodes -t f 2>/dev/null

# Check for any custom partials
echo -e "\n=== Checking for custom partials ==="
fd . layouts/partials -t f 2>/dev/null

# Check for any output format configurations
echo -e "\n=== Checking for output format configurations ==="
rg -A 5 "^\[outputs\]|^\[outputFormats|^\[mediaTypes" config/_default/config.toml

Length of output: 3100


Line range hint 1-14: Verify build command compatibility

The build commands use the --gc and --minify flags. These flags should be verified against the new Hugo version.

Let's check for any Hugo-specific build scripts:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about Hugo version compatibility by checking the repository documentation and configuration files.


Let me check the specific Hugo configuration and workflow files to verify the build command compatibility.


Build command flags are compatible with Hugo version

The --gc and --minify flags are standard Hugo build flags that have been supported across multiple Hugo versions, including the version specified in netlify.toml (0.139.3) and the one used in GitHub Actions (0.118.2). These flags are fundamental Hugo features:

  • --gc performs garbage collection during the build
  • --minify performs asset minification

Both flags are well-established and continue to be supported in newer Hugo versions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any custom build scripts that might need updating

# Look for build or deployment scripts
echo "Checking for build scripts..."
fd -e sh -e bash -e cmd -e ps1 "build|deploy"

# Check package.json for build scripts if it exists
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    echo "Checking package.json build scripts..."
    jq '.scripts | select(. != null)' package.json
fi

Length of output: 142


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for Hugo documentation and configuration
echo "Checking Hugo configuration and documentation..."

# Look for Hugo config files
echo "Hugo config files:"
fd -e toml -e yaml -e json "config|hugo"

# Check README and documentation
echo -e "\nChecking documentation:"
rg -i "hugo|build" README.md || echo "No README.md found or no relevant content"

# Check for workflow files that might contain build commands
echo -e "\nChecking workflow files:"
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/

Length of output: 763


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Hugo configuration and build workflow
echo "Checking Hugo config file:"
cat config/_default/config.toml

echo -e "\nChecking build workflow:"
cat .github/workflows/build.yml

# Check if there are any Hugo-specific build parameters
echo -e "\nChecking for Hugo build parameters:"
rg -i "gc|minify|hugo.*version" config/_default/config.toml .github/workflows/build.yml

Length of output: 4378


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@abtris abtris closed this Dec 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant