-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DJC: Ensure that we can run a scan from a PURL in DejaCode #131
Comments
This may require accessing data in private repos. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
PR #133 introduces support for PURLs in the "Add Package" feature. One or more PURL(s) can be submitted in place, or along download URL(s) in the "Add Package" modal. If the PURL type is supported by the packageurl library The second improvement is the addition of PurlDB lookup during the Add Package process. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
@tdruez I tried a couple of PURLs from the PurlDB to add a new package but keep getting "Error: error" on the submission form. Please see attached screenshot. |
@DennisClark I cannot reproduce the error on my side, the Packages are successfully added. |
@tdruez Success! browser cache refreshed (which I thought I had done earlier, but never mind) and creating a new package from a PURL went quickly and smoothly. Looks good to me. |
@tdruez I also verified that the Add Package from a PURL will not create a duplicate Package if it already exists. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Feature merged and deployed. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <[email protected]>
When we get results from a front-end ScanCode.io, we may have only PURLs, with little to no extra data.
In particular we may miss the download URL in "skinny" scan results from the "inspect package" pipeline.
PurlDB knows how to collect metadata and run scans on the archives of a package using a PURL input. We need the same from DejaCode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: