Cofusion about misassembly errors again

[Unaimend]

Hello, ages ago[1], I asked a question about how the misassemblies don't add up and you answered in much detail. At this moment this made sense to me that there is a difference between combined reference errors and per-reference errors.

But, now I am looking at the errors per species reference i.e.
in my report this species has 5 reported misassemblies

but at the same time, it has 5 relocations and also 5 interspecies translocations. So in total 10 misassembly errors. This is confusing me again. This time it cannot map ambiguously because it should only try to align to one single reference.

[1] #158

[Unaimend]

I cant read, the description of misassembly clearly states that its relocations + inversions + translocations