-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider releasing s390x and ppc64le binaries. #39
Comments
I've just spun up s390x support for ptex and the scie jump, but Power support seems problematic without further digging. There are compilation errors in sys crates which seem to necessitate upgrades or fixes. |
Ok, the ppc64le compilation issue is only in ptex and its only using the curl zlib-ng-compat feature which may not actually be needed at all (it looks like the feature was added out of ignorance due to Mac M2 build failures a long time ago). |
Ok, all the support work is done in ptex and scie-jump which both have support for s390x and powerpc64le as of the 1.5.0 release of each. |
Support was released on 0.10.0: https://github.com/a-scie/lift/releases/tag/v0.10.0 |
As of https://github.com/indygreg/python-build-standalone/releases/tag/20230726 PBS supports s390x and it has supported little endian Power chips for longer than that. Both architectures are used in systems amenable to larger binaries / more resource intensive apps (unlike exotic embedded architectures); so making
science
available for these architectures may spur unforeseen use scenarios.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: