-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
access=no winds up as construction lane #89
Comments
More cases in Firenze like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24579090 |
From my reading of the types that are there, constructed is taken to mean no access, so I'm not surprised by that behaviour :P psv=* should be understood at an early stage in osm2lanes, I think. First, parsing all the different values into a scheme, then combing all the access tags into a unified understanding. That gets simplified back down in osm2streets to "bus (+taxi +bike) lane" for the rendering |
That sounds like a good plan going forward. I'm starting to return to earlier questions about classifying lane types. In London, there are "bus lanes" that also allow cyclists and taxis. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24579090 in Firenze is basically a European living street -- pedestrians rule, motor vehicles are only OK with a permit and don't go fast, and thought it says no bicycles, based on my experience there a few weeks back, they happen but aren't the prioritized mode. Also in the PR I just sent, I'm still hacking on bits of behavior to the "classic" osm2lanes algorithm: 45732ea |
I think it would be cool to model all of these particular cases in terms of the "designated" and "yes"/"no" legal use ideas, because then we're actually using the OSM scheme to describe the situation, as it aims to do. |
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745724293 in
leeds_cycleway
for one example, but I think I've spotted others.In this one case,
psv=designated
should map to a bus lane. We only look forpsv=yes
today.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: