Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update layers #641

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/bitbake
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/meta-arm
Submodule meta-arm updated 26 files
+3 −0 .gitlab-ci.yml
+0 −2 meta-arm-bsp/conf/machine/include/tc.inc
+1 −1 meta-arm-bsp/conf/machine/juno.conf
+10 −1 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a/files/0001-plat-tc-Increase-maximum-BL2-size.patch
+21 −10 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a/trusted-firmware-a-tc.inc
+0 −14 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a/trusted-firmware-a_2.5.bbappend
+35 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0050-Comment-mm_communicate-failure-log.patch
+186 −0 ...-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot/corstone1000/0051-efi_loader-send-bootcomplete-message-to-secure-encla.patch
+2 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_%.bbappend
+10 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware-juno.inc
+1 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware_%.bbappend
+20 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-security/optee/optee-os-generic-tc.inc
+6 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-security/optee/optee-os-tadevkit_3.14.0.bbappend
+1 −17 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-security/optee/optee-os-tc.inc
+79 −0 ...p/recipes-security/trusted-services/secure-partitions/0032-smm_gateway-add-checks-for-null-attributes.patch
+1 −0 meta-arm-bsp/recipes-security/trusted-services/ts-corstone1000.inc
+0 −3 meta-arm-toolchain/conf/layer.conf
+0 −165 meta-arm-toolchain/custom-licenses/Armcompiler-License-agreement
+0 −36 meta-arm-toolchain/custom-licenses/Armcompiler-Redistributables
+0 −10 meta-arm-toolchain/custom-licenses/Armcompiler-Supplementary-terms
+0 −3,947 meta-arm-toolchain/custom-licenses/Armcompiler-Third-party-licenses
+10 −5 meta-arm-toolchain/recipes-devtools/external-arm-toolchain/armcompiler_6.17.bb
+12 −10 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/hafnium/hafnium/native-dtc.patch
+0 −12 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a/trusted-firmware-a_2.5.bb
+1 −0 meta-arm/recipes-bsp/uefi/edk2-firmware.inc
+1 −1 meta-arm/recipes-devtools/opencsd/opencsd_1.2.0.bb
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/meta-freescale-3rdparty
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/meta-openembedded
Submodule meta-openembedded updated 165 files
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/meta-qcom
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions sources/meta-yoe/conf/distro/yoe.inc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ MAINTAINER = "Yoe Distro Community <http://yoedistro.org>"
TARGET_VENDOR = "-yoe"
SDK_VENDOR = "-yoesdk"
# Distro version is YYYY.MM
DISTRO_VERSION = "2021.12"
DISTRO_CODENAME = "masai"
DISTRO_VERSION = "2022.01-rc.1"
DISTRO_CODENAME = "Navajo-Churro"
SDK_VERSION := "${DISTRO_VERSION}"

SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "yoe"
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions sources/meta-yoe/recipes-siot/simpleiot/simpleiot_git.bb
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ export CGO_ENABLED
INITSCRIPT_NAME = "siot"
INITSCRIPT_PARAMS = "start 99 5 . stop 20 6 ."

do_configure[network] = "1"
do_compile[network] = "1"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is interesting -- so bitbake must somehow block network access during these jobs by default? I guess that is a neat idea as it helps force source fetching to happen using official SRC_URI so that everything can be controlled. However, this begs the question -- how does the Go/Rust package ecosystem fit into the Yocto model?

Is this something we should report on in newsletter?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes a legit question:) we should expand on it in a newsletter edition

do_configure() {
export GOPATH=${GOPATH}
export GOFLAGS="-modcacherw"
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sources/openembedded-core
Submodule openembedded-core updated 203 files