Switch base image from openjdk to debian #163
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gengliangwang
pushed a commit
to apache/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2022
…emurin ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR switchs the base image from [`openjdk`](https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk) to [`eclipse-temurin`](https://hub.docker.com/_/eclipse-temurin) (original openjdk). The core change is: the OS of base image changes `debian-bullseye` to `ubuntu-focal` (based on debian bullseye). ### Why are the changes needed? - According to docker-library/openjdk#505 and docker-library/docs#2162, openjdk:8/11 image is EOL and Eclipse Temurin replaces this, the original openjdk image will `remove the 11 and 8 tags (in October 2022, perhaps)` (we are using it in spark), so we have to switch this before it happens. - The `openjdk` is [not update anymore](https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html) (the last releases were 8u342 and 11.0.16, Eclipse Temurin replace is recommanded by adoptopenjdk) that means even the 8/11 tag is not removed, we still need to switch `openjdk`. - There were [many docker official image](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Adocker-library+temurin&type=code) already switch openjdk to eclipse-temurin. - According the [jvm ecosystem report](https://snyk.io/jvm-ecosystem-report-2021) from docker-library/docs#2162 , AdoptOpenJDK(now donation to eclipse foundation and rename to eclipse temurin) builds of OpenJDK most popular in production. - An ideal long-term solution is that we only choose the jdk version and leave the adaptation of OS to the corresponding openjdk official image (just like eclipse-temurin are suppoort [ubuntu, alpine, centos](https://github.com/adoptium/containers/tree/main/11/jre)) - The alternate solution is we just swith `openjdk` image to `debian-bullseye` with openjdk 11 installation. like: Yikun#163. But it makes spark image **depends on debian OS more**, that means we will diffcult to support the Java version which debian OS doesn't support (such as openjdk-8-jre is not be supported in current debian anymore). For the above reason, I think `eclipse-temurin` is a good choice. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the docker images base image changes. ### How was this patch tested? CI passed, I also have a local test on: Yikun#162 Closes #37705 from Yikun/switch-temurin. Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>
a0x8o
added a commit
to a0x8o/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2022
…emurin ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR switchs the base image from [`openjdk`](https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk) to [`eclipse-temurin`](https://hub.docker.com/_/eclipse-temurin) (original openjdk). The core change is: the OS of base image changes `debian-bullseye` to `ubuntu-focal` (based on debian bullseye). ### Why are the changes needed? - According to docker-library/openjdk#505 and docker-library/docs#2162, openjdk:8/11 image is EOL and Eclipse Temurin replaces this, the original openjdk image will `remove the 11 and 8 tags (in October 2022, perhaps)` (we are using it in spark), so we have to switch this before it happens. - The `openjdk` is [not update anymore](https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html) (the last releases were 8u342 and 11.0.16, Eclipse Temurin replace is recommanded by adoptopenjdk) that means even the 8/11 tag is not removed, we still need to switch `openjdk`. - There were [many docker official image](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Adocker-library+temurin&type=code) already switch openjdk to eclipse-temurin. - According the [jvm ecosystem report](https://snyk.io/jvm-ecosystem-report-2021) from docker-library/docs#2162 , AdoptOpenJDK(now donation to eclipse foundation and rename to eclipse temurin) builds of OpenJDK most popular in production. - An ideal long-term solution is that we only choose the jdk version and leave the adaptation of OS to the corresponding openjdk official image (just like eclipse-temurin are suppoort [ubuntu, alpine, centos](https://github.com/adoptium/containers/tree/main/11/jre)) - The alternate solution is we just swith `openjdk` image to `debian-bullseye` with openjdk 11 installation. like: Yikun/spark#163. But it makes spark image **depends on debian OS more**, that means we will diffcult to support the Java version which debian OS doesn't support (such as openjdk-8-jre is not be supported in current debian anymore). For the above reason, I think `eclipse-temurin` is a good choice. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the docker images base image changes. ### How was this patch tested? CI passed, I also have a local test on: Yikun/spark#162 Closes #37705 from Yikun/switch-temurin. Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>
|
We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. |
a0x8o
added a commit
to a0x8o/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2022
…emurin ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR switchs the base image from [`openjdk`](https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk) to [`eclipse-temurin`](https://hub.docker.com/_/eclipse-temurin) (original openjdk). The core change is: the OS of base image changes `debian-bullseye` to `ubuntu-focal` (based on debian bullseye). ### Why are the changes needed? - According to docker-library/openjdk#505 and docker-library/docs#2162, openjdk:8/11 image is EOL and Eclipse Temurin replaces this, the original openjdk image will `remove the 11 and 8 tags (in October 2022, perhaps)` (we are using it in spark), so we have to switch this before it happens. - The `openjdk` is [not update anymore](https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html) (the last releases were 8u342 and 11.0.16, Eclipse Temurin replace is recommanded by adoptopenjdk) that means even the 8/11 tag is not removed, we still need to switch `openjdk`. - There were [many docker official image](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Adocker-library+temurin&type=code) already switch openjdk to eclipse-temurin. - According the [jvm ecosystem report](https://snyk.io/jvm-ecosystem-report-2021) from docker-library/docs#2162 , AdoptOpenJDK(now donation to eclipse foundation and rename to eclipse temurin) builds of OpenJDK most popular in production. - An ideal long-term solution is that we only choose the jdk version and leave the adaptation of OS to the corresponding openjdk official image (just like eclipse-temurin are suppoort [ubuntu, alpine, centos](https://github.com/adoptium/containers/tree/main/11/jre)) - The alternate solution is we just swith `openjdk` image to `debian-bullseye` with openjdk 11 installation. like: Yikun/spark#163. But it makes spark image **depends on debian OS more**, that means we will diffcult to support the Java version which debian OS doesn't support (such as openjdk-8-jre is not be supported in current debian anymore). For the above reason, I think `eclipse-temurin` is a good choice. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the docker images base image changes. ### How was this patch tested? CI passed, I also have a local test on: Yikun/spark#162 Closes #37705 from Yikun/switch-temurin. Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>
a0x8o
added a commit
to a0x8o/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2022
…emurin ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR switchs the base image from [`openjdk`](https://hub.docker.com/_/openjdk) to [`eclipse-temurin`](https://hub.docker.com/_/eclipse-temurin) (original openjdk). The core change is: the OS of base image changes `debian-bullseye` to `ubuntu-focal` (based on debian bullseye). ### Why are the changes needed? - According to docker-library/openjdk#505 and docker-library/docs#2162, openjdk:8/11 image is EOL and Eclipse Temurin replaces this, the original openjdk image will `remove the 11 and 8 tags (in October 2022, perhaps)` (we are using it in spark), so we have to switch this before it happens. - The `openjdk` is [not update anymore](https://adoptopenjdk.net/upstream.html) (the last releases were 8u342 and 11.0.16, Eclipse Temurin replace is recommanded by adoptopenjdk) that means even the 8/11 tag is not removed, we still need to switch `openjdk`. - There were [many docker official image](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Adocker-library+temurin&type=code) already switch openjdk to eclipse-temurin. - According the [jvm ecosystem report](https://snyk.io/jvm-ecosystem-report-2021) from docker-library/docs#2162 , AdoptOpenJDK(now donation to eclipse foundation and rename to eclipse temurin) builds of OpenJDK most popular in production. - An ideal long-term solution is that we only choose the jdk version and leave the adaptation of OS to the corresponding openjdk official image (just like eclipse-temurin are suppoort [ubuntu, alpine, centos](https://github.com/adoptium/containers/tree/main/11/jre)) - The alternate solution is we just swith `openjdk` image to `debian-bullseye` with openjdk 11 installation. like: Yikun/spark#163. But it makes spark image **depends on debian OS more**, that means we will diffcult to support the Java version which debian OS doesn't support (such as openjdk-8-jre is not be supported in current debian anymore). For the above reason, I think `eclipse-temurin` is a good choice. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the docker images base image changes. ### How was this patch tested? CI passed, I also have a local test on: Yikun/spark#162 Closes #37705 from Yikun/switch-temurin. Authored-by: Yikun Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?