This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 23, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
feat: add an interface to get read_throttling_reject_count perf counter #940
Closed
Closed
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -603,5 +603,14 @@ ::dsn::error_code replication_app_base::update_init_info_ballot_and_decree(repli | |
_info.init_offset_in_private_log, | ||
r->last_durable_decree()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
dsn::perf_counter *replication_app_base::get_counter_recent_read_throttling_reject_count() | ||
{ | ||
; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. remove this line |
||
dassert(_replica->_counter_recent_read_throttling_reject_count.get(), | ||
"_counter_recent_read_throttling_reject_count is null"); | ||
|
||
return _replica->_counter_recent_read_throttling_reject_count.get(); | ||
} | ||
} // namespace replication | ||
} // namespace dsn |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why didn't you return the smart pointer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the original perf_counter is a raw point, passed by
_counter_recent_read_throttling_reject_count.get()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @levy5307, it's better to avoid raw pointer and use smart pointer, although the original value is raw.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's meaningless to wrap a raw point by shared_ptr
I think it's no risk there because
replica
has the longer lifetime than_app
ref: https://github.com/XiaoMi/rdsn/blob/master/src/replica/replica.h#L568
https://github.com/XiaoMi/rdsn/blob/master/src/replica/replica.h#L488
If I refactor raw point to shared_ptr here, it would be a big change, due to there are many codes using
define
, and I have to replace->
to->operator->()
ref: https://github.com/XiaoMi/rdsn/blob/master/src/replica/replica_throttle.cpp#L30
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have another question, why would you like to pass this perf-counter to pegasus?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the throttling_controller works on Pegasus, so must use the same perf_counter to collect read reject count
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, the function put here seems to be strange