fix: fix replica::init_table_level_latency_counter metric name error

[zouweiming758]

We should use taskcode(code).to_string() to get metric name , not taskcode(code) to get _internal_code.

[neverchanje]

Your code is not formatted. Please run clang-format-3.9 via ./scripts/linux/run-clang-format.sh.

[zouweiming758]

Your code is not formatted. Please run clang-format-3.9 via ./scripts/linux/run-clang-format.sh.

it's ok,now. @neverchanje

[zouweiming758]

please check this pr，thanks @neverchanje

[neverchanje]

Sorry for late response. Since I've been busy dealing with my personal issues these days, I didn't have the time to check and test if your modication works. Would you pls add some tests result in the desctiption? I will do some testing too later today.

[zhangyifan27]

I tested it and found that the output is same whether using task_code(code) or task_code(code).to_string(), and of course task_code(code).to_string() is more formal.

[zouweiming758]

I tested it and found that the output is same whether using task_code(code) or task_code(code).to_string(), and of course task_code(code).to_string() is more formal.

But when I use task_code(code), the output is _internal_code. Do you know why?

[zhangyifan27]

I have no idea, maybe some convertions happened in the format function.
I added a log:

ddebug_f("counter str is {} vs {}", task_code(code), task_code(code).to_string());

And it turned out the output is the same in both ways:

D2021-05-26 14:10:20.988 (1622009420988640036 17174) replica.replica0.0301000000000001: replica.cpp:534:init_table_level_latency_counters(): counter str is RPC_RRDB_RRDB_BULK_LOAD vs RPC_RRDB_RRDB_BULK_LOAD
D2021-05-26 14:10:20.988 (1622009420988662951 17174) replica.replica0.0301000000000001: replica.cpp:534:init_table_level_latency_counters(): counter str is RPC_RRDB_RRDB_PUT vs RPC_RRDB_RRDB_PUT
D2021-05-26 14:10:20.988 (1622009420988671404 17174) replica.replica0.0301000000000001: replica.cpp:534:init_table_level_latency_counters(): counter str is RPC_RRDB_RRDB_MULTI_PUT vs RPC_RRDB_RRDB_MULTI_PUT
D2021-05-26 14:10:20.988 (1622009420988692532 17174) replica.replica0.0301000000000001: replica.cpp:534:init_table_level_latency_counters(): counter str is RPC_RRDB_RRDB_REMOVE vs RPC_RRDB_RRDB_REMOVE
D2021-05-26 14:10:20.988 (1622009420988701220 17174) replica.replica0.0301000000000001: replica.cpp:534:init_table_level_latency_counters(): counter str is RPC_RRDB_RRDB_MULTI_REMOVE vs RPC_RRDB_RRDB_MULTI_REMOVE
...

[levy5307]

@lidingshengHHU Thanks for your pull request. Merged