-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Block Editor: Apply allowed_block_types filter to registered blocks #419
Block Editor: Apply allowed_block_types filter to registered blocks #419
Conversation
Use case example: WordPress/gutenberg#24006 |
Makes sense to me! |
No objections from me either but curious about backward compatibility implications. |
I think this should be mostly backward compatible, since the hook always accepted either an array of block names, or a bool, so filters attached to the hook would have to check with which of either they were dealing. In practice, they couldn't count on getting an array from which they could remove something, so the filter was only used for allow lists rather than deny lists. (As e.g. the docs show.) So I think we're adding functionality without really impacting existing usage. Furthermore, the filter is applied right before the LMK if you're thinking of a scenario that I'm missing 🤔 |
Ping @TimothyBJacobs and @youknowriad -- Are we cool to merge this? 😄 |
I've been thinking more here and I think we should not move forward with this. The reason being that all blocks are not registered on the server, so as implemented here, it means all the blocks registered on the frontend are not allowed by default. |
@ockham sounds like we should close out this PR? |
@youknowriad That makes sense, but it also limits the potential use cases of the server-side filter significantly: It can basically never be used as a denylist. IMO, this raises the question of the general usefulness of this filter -- since there are also client-side mechanisms to both register or unregister a block. Should we:
|
Yeah the only times I've been able to use |
Yeah, that could work 🤔 It might not perfectly cover cases where e.g. you'd like to remove all blocks in a certain namespace (rather than listing them explicitly, because e.g. they might come from a plugin that has added more blocks in more recent versions), but I guess it's a start... |
We could support including a namespace in the list, so both |
Closing this PR as the associate Trac ticket https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/50706 was closed 7 weeks ago. If any maintainer or committer feels this ticket and PR should be reopened, please update accordingly. |
The
allowed_block_types
hook filters a list of blocks. Alternatively, it's possible to pass a bool to indicate that either all blocks are allowed (true
), or none of them are (false
).It's currently applied in
lib/edit-form-blocks.php
to a default value oftrue
-- meaning all blocks are allowed.However, this means that the filter can only really be used for an allowlist, but not for a denylist: Since we don't really have access to the full list of available blocks from the filter (but just that
true
bool), we cannot choose to remove a set of blocks from that list.I'm thus suggesting to pass the full list of registered blocks to the filter as the default value instead.
Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/50706
This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.