Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport: WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver changes #3901

Closed

Conversation

Mamaduka
Copy link
Member

@Mamaduka Mamaduka commented Jan 24, 2023

Backport changes and fixes merged into a Gutenberg plugin after WP 6.1.

Related Gutenberg PRs:

I'm going to backport WordPress/gutenberg#46112 separately.

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/57545


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@Mamaduka Mamaduka force-pushed the backport/theme-json-resolver-changes branch from c83e48a to f3cc87c Compare January 24, 2023 13:13
Copy link
Contributor

@audrasjb audrasjb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small docblock change proposal

Comment on lines +535 to +539

wp_recursive_ksort( $data );
wp_recursive_ksort( $expected );

$this->assertSameSets( $data, $expected );
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it preferred sorting arrays before assertions, or can we use something like assertEqualsCanonicalizing?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here the deeply nested array of arrays are being recursively key sorted before the assertion. assertSameSets() repeats an index sort at the first dimension of the arrays. That's not necessary.

Instead of assertSameSets(), use assertSame().

I'm wondering though why this needed. Pulling down to explore.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, @hellofromtonya

Let me know if any follow-ups are needed for PHPUnits tests on this PR.

@hellofromtonya
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Mamaduka, is this PR and Trac ticket still needed? I remember you were breaking up the GB PRs into smaller Trac tickets. Just checking before I dive into it.

@Mamaduka
Copy link
Member Author

Mamaduka commented Feb 2, 2023

@hellofromtonya, that was for WP_Theme_JSON file. I decided to keep this one since I had already done the work, and most of the line changes were for PHPUnit tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@costdev costdev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @Mamaduka! Just a few suggestions. 🙂

src/wp-includes/class-wp-theme-json-resolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/phpunit/tests/theme/wpThemeJsonResolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/phpunit/tests/theme/wpThemeJsonResolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/phpunit/tests/theme/wpThemeJsonResolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/phpunit/tests/theme/wpThemeJsonResolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/phpunit/tests/theme/wpThemeJsonResolver.php Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mamaduka and others added 8 commits February 3, 2023 16:12
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colin Stewart <[email protected]>
@Mamaduka
Copy link
Member Author

Mamaduka commented Feb 3, 2023

Thanks for the suggestions, @costdev!

@felixarntz
Copy link
Member

felixarntz commented Feb 4, 2023

Performance check ✅

I gave this some server-side performance tests for the frontend, measuring TT3 on the home page and a single post with the Gutenberg demo content, using https://gist.github.com/felixarntz/de5c697a1a16c2b892634b70216eb6c7.

TLDR / Summary / Conclusion

Results look inconclusive. Function-specific benchmarks show a clear improvement, while overall WordPress execution time shows inconsistent results between the two tests. This suggests that the changes in this PR probably enhance performance, but overall does not have a great impact on performance. At the same time, it also means that there is no concern about merging this, so we can proceed from that perspective.

Results

All times below are in milliseconds.

First I benchmarked overall WP load time. Every test row below is actually based on the median of 20 runs itself. So overall this is 120 runs per scenario.

  trunk @ [55218] plus PR #3901 % diff
Home page (test 1) 193.99 206.9 6.65%
Gutenberg demo (test 1) 195.65 193.1 -1.30%
Home page (test 2) 194.31 198.11 1.96%
Gutenberg demo (test 2) 194.98 191.46 -1.81%
Home page (test 3) 198.5 203.47 2.50%
Gutenberg demo (test 3) 193.64 202.12 4.38%

Because the results didn't show a clear trend in either direction, I wanted to see at least more specifically whether certain WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver class methods showed performance increases or regressions here.

Here are the results for WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_merged_data(), again based on 20 runs per scenario (for the home page):

  trunk @ [55218] plus PR #3901 % diff
get_merged_data() time 14.63 13.99 -4.37%
get_merged_data() calls 50 50 0.00%
WP total time 199.01 202.04 1.52%

Here are the results for WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver::get_user_data_from_wp_global_styles(), again based on 20 runs per scenario (for the home page):

  trunk @ [55218] plus PR #3901 % diff
get_user_data_from_...() time 2.5 1.57 -37.20%
get_user_data_from...() calls 2 2 0.00%
WP total time 198.64 196.6 -1.03%

Both of the above show improvements for their respective method's performance, so that's promising. We will have to see whether this has any impact in the field, but overall it certainly looks unproblematic, and if anything, there is a positive trend in WP_Theme_JSON_Resolver performance. The overall WP execution time differences are too inconsistent to mean anything, likely due to high variance.

Note: The get_style_variations() method was not covered as it is not invoked in the frontend and thus has no impact there.

Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Mamaduka Thanks! Code-wise this all looks solid to me, and performance-wise as well per my above feedback.

@Mamaduka
Copy link
Member Author

Mamaduka commented Feb 6, 2023

Thanks for the reviews and testing, folks 🙇

It would be great to get this committed before Beta 1.

@ntsekouras
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants