mirrored from git://develop.git.wordpress.org/
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename WP_Theme::is_block_based
to WP_Theme::is_block_theme
and wp_is_block_template_theme
to wp_is_block_theme
#2014
Closed
anton-vlasenko
wants to merge
6
commits into
WordPress:trunk
from
anton-vlasenko:fix/refactor-wp_is_block_template_theme
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
450c03d
Rename wp_is_block_template_theme to wp_is_block_theme.
anton-vlasenko ed79860
Rename WP_Theme::is_block_based to wp_is_block_theme.
anton-vlasenko 09d4062
Use wp_get_theme()->is_block_theme() inside the wp_is_block_theme fun…
anton-vlasenko 591267f
Small change.
anton-vlasenko 24ae6ca
Revert "Small change."
anton-vlasenko 66e9013
Refactor the test as suggested here: https://github.com/WordPress/wor…
anton-vlasenko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@anton-vlasenko As Gutenberg has to support WP 5.7 and 5.8, how will renaming this function impact the plugin? Are you planning to rename it in Gutenberg too and deprecate the original name? Or does renaming not affect Gutenberg?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hellofromtonya Companion issue is here and the PR for that issue seems to have been updated in line with this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @costdev for pointing that out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hellofromtonya
Yes, I'm planning to rename it in Gutenberg. I've created a PR that renames it.
IMO it doesn't make sense to keep both
wp_is_block_theme
andwp_is_block_template_theme
functions in WordPress Core.I think we still have time to rename it in Gutenberg before the Gutenberg 12.1.0 release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @anton-vlasenko. Part of the consolidation discuss is to help with the backports from Gutenberg to Core. So wanted to make sure whatever happens here also happens in the Gutenberg repo too, i.e. code matches.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for making sure, @hellofromtonya.
I 100% agree.
We need to be careful to make sure we don't break Gutenberg.