Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Unify pre-commit config across repos #1006

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2022
Merged

Unify pre-commit config across repos #1006

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2022

Conversation

dhruvkb
Copy link
Member

@dhruvkb dhruvkb commented Nov 11, 2022

Fixes

Addresses WordPress/openverse#316 by @dhruvkb

Description

This PR uses the new pre-commit config introduced in WordPress/openverse#330 and fixes the code so that the lint checks pass.

Checklist

  • My pull request has a descriptive title (not a vague title like Update index.md).
  • My pull request targets the default branch of the repository (main) or a parent feature branch.
  • My commit messages follow best practices.
  • My code follows the established code style of the repository.
  • I added or updated tests for the changes I made (if applicable).
  • I added or updated documentation (if applicable).
  • I tried running the project locally and verified that there are no visible errors.

Developer Certificate of Origin

Developer Certificate of Origin
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1

Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.


Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
    have the right to submit it under the open source license
    indicated in the file; or

(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
    of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
    license and I have the right under that license to submit that
    work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
    permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
    in the file; or

(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
    person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
    it.

(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
    are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
    personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
    maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
    this project or the open source license(s) involved.

@dhruvkb dhruvkb added 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed ✨ goal: improvement Improvement to an existing user-facing feature 🤖 aspect: dx Concerns developers' experience with the codebase labels Nov 11, 2022
@dhruvkb dhruvkb requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2022 06:21
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 11, 2022

API Developer Docs Preview: Ready

https://wordpress.github.io/openverse-api/_preview/1006

Please note that GitHub pages takes a little time to deploy newly pushed code, if the links above don't work or you see old versions, wait 5 minutes and try again.

You can check the GitHub pages deployment action list to see the current status of the deployments.

Copy link
Contributor

@obulat obulat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cleaner look is always welcome :)

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ def _unmasked_query_end(page_size, page):

def _paginate_with_dead_link_mask(
s: Search, page_size: int, page: int
) -> Tuple[int, int]:
) -> tuple[int, int]:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting that it replaces the types this way!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that it saves imports 😄

@@ -19,6 +21,7 @@ repos:
args:
- --remove
- id: pretty-format-json
exclude: package(-lock)?\.json
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this affect tsconfig.json in any way?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This isn't being synced with the frontend yet. There are some repo-specific hooks in the frontend so syncing them centrally is not feasible (yet).

Copy link
Member

@krysal krysal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the syntax standardization across Repos ✨

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
# Add pyupgrade
5158c579d0c8eeb6e9372b30a03ce48f53459958
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if this does something after squashing 💭

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're completely right, that'll not work!

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ def _unmasked_query_end(page_size, page):

def _paginate_with_dead_link_mask(
s: Search, page_size: int, page: int
) -> Tuple[int, int]:
) -> tuple[int, int]:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like that it saves imports 😄

from typing import Iterable
from collections.abc import Iterable
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting change 😮

Comment on lines -116 to +115
res_2_ids = set(result["id"] for result in data_without_dead_links["results"])
res_1_ids = {result["id"] for result in data_with_dead_links["results"]}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I kind of like that the set() is more explicit as the {} could be confused by a dictionary if one doesn't pay attention, but I guess it is acceptable.

@dhruvkb dhruvkb merged commit ea2162f into main Nov 11, 2022
@dhruvkb dhruvkb deleted the one_true_lint branch November 11, 2022 21:25
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
🤖 aspect: dx Concerns developers' experience with the codebase ✨ goal: improvement Improvement to an existing user-facing feature 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants