Style Book: fix comment output in styles #66439
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stokesman
added
[Type] Bug
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
stokesman
changed the title
ramonjd
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2024
karthick-murugan
pushed a commit
to karthick-murugan/gutenberg
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
Co-authored-by: ramonjd <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Removes a JS comment that is output in the Style Book styles. It looks like this came about in #65430.
Why?
The comment prevents the adjacent ruleset from applying.
How?
Keeps the comment yet moves it out of the styles string.
Testing Instructions
.root-containerelementdisplayisflow-rootScreenshots or screencast
In case it helps illustrate the issue and how it can be verified in trunk here’s a demo showing it. The
root-containersare given a background color and the paragraph some margins so it’s visible when they become contained.style-book-non-flow-root-root-container.mp4