Block Editor: Fix incorrect '_n' usage #41886
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mamaduka
requested review from
draganescu and
mcsf
and removed request for
ellatrix
Mamaduka
added
[Type] Bug
|
Size Change: +1 B (0%) Total Size: 1.25 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
mcsf
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
PR fixes the incorrect
_ntranslation method usage in the Block Editor package.The issue was initially reported in the core-editor Slack channel. Props to @tobifjellner.
Why?
The
_ntranslation function shouldn't be used for "one item" or "more than one items" cases. Details - https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/_n/#comment-2397Testing Instructions