adds rp to exn to work with >1.2.0-dev4 #905
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kevin Griffin <[email protected]>
| @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ class Serder: | |||
| Ilks.bar: Fieldage(saids={Saids.d: DigDex.Blake3_256}, | |||
| alls=dict(v='', t='',d='', i='', dt='', r='',a=[])), | |||
| Ilks.exn: Fieldage(saids={Saids.d: DigDex.Blake3_256}, | |||
| alls=dict(v='', t='', d='', i="", p="", dt='', r='', q={}, | |||
| alls=dict(v='', t='', d='', i="", rp="", p="", dt='', r='', q={}, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The PR is against 1.1 - renamed to be clear.
Rp field was added 1.2.0-dev4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The PR is against 1.1 - renamed to be clear.
Rp field was added 1.2.0-dev4
Sure, but what is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Top level recipient field. This was discussed some time ago, hence its addition to 1.2.+
It was added to save unpacking the a.r field.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Top level recipient field. This was discussed some time ago, hence its addition to 1.2.+ It was added to save unpacking the
a.rfield.
Do you remember when? It hasn't been added to the specs yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The specs show Ver_2_0 but it looks like it’s ri in there, these are against Ver_1_0 and Ver_1_1
m00sey
changed the title
|
The fix should be that an
|
No description provided.