Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename StoreTrunc to StoreWrap for consistency #91

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2015
Merged

Conversation

lukewagner
Copy link
Member

@sunfishcode pointed out that we consistently use "wrap" instead of "truncate" to describe larger-to-smaller integer conversions, so this PR renames StoreTrunc to StoreWrap which is nicer anyway since it's shorter and replaces an abbreviation with a real word. Also tidies up README.md.

@lukewagner
Copy link
Member Author

Merging since this seems pretty uncontroversial.

lukewagner added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2015
Rename StoreTrunc to StoreWrap for consistency
@lukewagner lukewagner merged commit 130d6ba into master Oct 1, 2015
@lukewagner lukewagner deleted the trunc-to-wrap branch October 1, 2015 16:22
eqrion pushed a commit to eqrion/wasm-spec that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2019
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
…ebAssembly#91)

To work on the `exception-handling` formal spec, this repository should be up to date with the required `reference-types` spec.
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
dhil pushed a commit to dhil/webassembly-spec that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
rossberg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
* Update JS API tests for memory64 and table64

* Add memory and table matching tests

* Improve loop in assert_Table

* Update spec tests to "address"

* Rename params in table assertion func
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant