-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unsigned dot product from overview #73
Conversation
Why? |
Oh, misread #52. In the description, you cancelled the i32x4 dot products, i think that's a mistake. It should be removing unsigned dot products. |
| `i32x4.dot_i8x16_i7x16_add_u` | 0x115 | unimplemented | | ||
| Reserved for bfloat16 | 0x116 | unimplemented | | ||
| Reserved | 0x117 - 0x12F | | | ||
| `i32x4.dot_i8x16_i7x16_add_s` | 0x113 | unimplemented | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to confirm: we are changing i32x4.dot_i8x16_i7x16_add_s
code here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, or do you think we should leave a gap in case we figure something out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's fine as changed (to not leave a gap). I was checking and commenting since current implementations need to adjust that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We haven't prototyped this yet, so no objections to the opcode number being changed.
No description provided.