Advance to phase 2? #95
Comments
|
PR to resolve nullref trap issue: #97 |
|
I was planning to propose for a vote sometime in January in a video CG meeting, but given that we have an in-person meeting just a few more weeks away, would it be better to do the vote on the in-person CG meeting? I don't mind either though. |
|
Yes, I think the in-person meeting is a good time. |
|
We decided to advance the proposal to phase 2 in the in-person CG meeting in Feb. Thank you! |
ioannad
pushed a commit
to ioannad/exception-handling
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2020
This also adds `table.set` and `table.get` administrative instructions. Only `table.set` is used for now, but `table.copy` will use both.
ioannad
pushed a commit
to ioannad/exception-handling
that referenced
this issue
Jun 6, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently #93, PR to update overview on traps and JS API, is out for review, and we are discussing whether
rethrowandbr_on_exnshould trap onnullrefin #90. After these two are landed / resolved, I'd like to propose to advance the EH proposal to phase 2. Do people think there are any remaining concerns before we advance?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: