-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Step 13.3-4 in element definition should clarify the ordering #542
Labels
Comments
Makes sense, I was assuming with my JavaScript background that it was an ordered map, but I should definitely should clarify. |
Yeah, it was pretty obvious that's what you meant from JS semantics but I think it's good to be explicit in specifications :) |
domenic
added a commit
to whatwg/html
that referenced
this issue
Aug 11, 2016
domenic
added a commit
to whatwg/html
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2016
alice
pushed a commit
to alice/html
that referenced
this issue
Jan 8, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Steps 13.3 and 13.4 of the element definition algorithm doesn't explicitly state the ordering of
Get
other than implicitly defining it via a map.We should either call it an ordered map, or explicitly state the order by which these properties are obtained as they're observable via
Proxy
objects or getter.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: