Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify the easier parts of appHistory.transition #144

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2021
Merged

Specify the easier parts of appHistory.transition #144

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2021

Conversation

domenic
Copy link
Collaborator

@domenic domenic commented Aug 6, 2021

That is, the rollback() spec remains a TODO.


Preview | Diff

@domenic domenic requested a review from natechapin August 6, 2021 18:32
spec.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
domenic added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2021
For web-developer-facing purposes, the .d.ts file is probably better. And, after #144, the only thing missing from the spec itself is the per-entry event handlers.
spec.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
@domenic domenic merged commit f966ea3 into main Aug 13, 2021
@domenic domenic deleted the transition branch August 13, 2021 21:15
domenic added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2021
For web-developer-facing purposes, the .d.ts file is probably better. And, after #144, the only thing missing from the spec itself is the per-entry event handlers.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants