details of maps - what should be visible on each

[hotzevzl]

https://vizzuality.atlassian.net/browse/MARXAN-767

Overview

Please write a description. If the PR is hard to understand, provide a quick explanation of the code.

Designs

Link to the related design prototypes (if applicable)

Testing instructions

Please explain how to test the PR: ID of a dataset, steps to reach the feature, etc.

Feature relevant tickets

Link to the related task manager tickets

---

Checklist before submitting

• Meaningful commits and code rebased on develop.
• If this PR adds feature that should be tested for regressions when
  deploying to staging/production, please add brief testing instructions
  to the deploy checklist (docs/deployment-checklist.md)
• Update CHANGELOG file

[vercel]

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployments, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

marxan – ./app

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vizzuality1/marxan/Db4zHMmPq8uD39bzYBEsrmYVLUDs
✅ Preview: https://marxan-git-docs-productmarxan-767review-of-m-fbd988-vizzuality1.vercel.app

marxan-storybook – ./app

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vizzuality1/marxan-storybook/9yaafNDrz9FVums8dPosdiceMagN
✅ Preview: https://marxan-storybook-git-docs-productmarxan-767r-fa3216-vizzuality1.vercel.app

[kgajowy]

@hotzevzl looks good to me. Are we currently missing any of the elements that should be visible?

[hotzevzl]

@hotzevzl looks good to me. Are we currently missing any of the elements that should be visible?

in the last week or so, I have experienced missing features (Planning units where at least one feature is present are highlighted (indigo)) occasionally in pre-gap analysis. That was puzzling as IIRC the project where I saw this was created afresh on a branch that had all the most recent logic about pre-calculating which PUs "contain" which features, though once I created a new project in the same instance, same branch, all was being displayed correctly. So that's something to keep an eye on in case it happens again and we can reproduce it.

[hotzevzl]

@hotzevzl looks good to me. Are we currently missing any of the elements that should be visible?

in the last week or so, I have experienced missing features (Planning units where at least one feature is present are highlighted (indigo)) occasionally in pre-gap analysis. That was puzzling as IIRC the project where I saw this was created afresh on a branch that had all the most recent logic about pre-calculating which PUs "contain" which features, though once I created a new project in the same instance, same branch, all was being displayed correctly. So that's something to keep an eye on in case it happens again and we can reproduce it.

there may actually be something happening with z-index (or whatever applies in this context) in the frontend, as I am doing some unrelated checks now and features are highlighted or lowlighted depending on what else is high/low-lighted. I'll open a bug if I can pinpoint things more precisely.