Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: sdk with double start prevention #6146

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

kwasniew
Copy link
Contributor

@kwasniew kwasniew commented Feb 7, 2024

About the changes

Upgrading Node SDK to a version with double start prevention. We already prevent the issue at the call site but now the SDK is also immune to the problem. Using beta version for now so that we can dogfood.

Important files

Discussion points

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2024 8:32am
unleash-monorepo-frontend ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2024 8:32am

Copy link

@codescene-delta-analysis codescene-delta-analysis bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Health Quality Gates: OK

  • Declining Code Health: 0 findings(s) 🚩
  • Improving Code Health: 0 findings(s) ✅
  • Affected Hotspots: 0 files(s) 🔥

Recommended Review Level: Detailed -- Increased risk for defects: The risk is higher as much of the code in this repo (99% of all commits) is written by other authors.
View detailed results in CodeScene

@kwasniew kwasniew merged commit 7e9958d into main Feb 7, 2024
7 checks passed
@kwasniew kwasniew deleted the node-sdk-double-start-prevention branch February 7, 2024 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants