Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bump sor to 4.14.3 - fix: tenderly doesn't support monad testnet #800

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

jsy1218
Copy link
Member

@jsy1218 jsy1218 commented Jan 17, 2025

  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
    Bug fix

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
    tenderly doesn't support monad testnet

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
    bypass tenderly for monad testnt

  • Other information:

Copy link
Member Author

jsy1218 commented Jan 17, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@jsy1218 jsy1218 marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 19:26
@jsy1218 jsy1218 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 19:26
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested review from xrsv, a team and cgkol January 17, 2025 19:28
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Request reviewers once CI passes on smart-order-router repo" took an action on this PR • (01/17/25)

4 reviewers were added and 1 assignee was added to this PR based on Siyu Jiang (See-You John)'s automation.

@jsy1218 jsy1218 merged commit 20cffa0 into main Jan 17, 2025
22 of 31 checks passed
Copy link
Member Author

jsy1218 commented Jan 17, 2025

Merge activity

  • Jan 17, 2:31 PM EST: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.

@jsy1218 jsy1218 deleted the siyujiang/fix-tenderly-not-support-monad-testnet branch January 17, 2025 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants