-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade feature Intended for #207
Upgrade feature Intended for #207
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #207 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.00% 78.78% +0.77%
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 773 773
Branches 109 111 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 603 609 +6
+ Misses 138 134 -4
+ Partials 32 30 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
id
field works great but I wonder whether we should keep the former method as well to prevent current pipeline from breaking as all config files would need to be updated. So maybe printing a warning instead of an error?
No description provided.