Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

thresholds #23

Open
temospena opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

thresholds #23

temospena opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@temospena
Copy link
Member

Two research questions here:

  1. Do different cities should have different thresholds for selection of what is a candidate and what is not?
    For instance, we use thresholds for population, entorpy, degree, betweeness, closeness and bus frequency.
    Having some city clusters suggesting which levels to adopt should be preferred.
    Next step: have some municipality cluster process.

  2. Should we use the value for thresholds or the quartiles?
    If we have a betweness typically with this distribution (recalling that values are re-scaled 0-1), when cutting the lower and upper 0.20 is different than cutting the lower and upper 20% (quartile).
    image

The cutting value could also come from the clusters, but we know this is a high-sensitivity variable. Quartiles are preferred?

Example for betweeness cuting of 0.20, the number of candidates can be less or more restrictive.

in value in quartile
Porto 21 % 60 %
Almada 3 % 60 %
Ourém 8 % 60 %
temospena added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2024
in betweeness, to be the same method as closeness
in discussion in #23
temospena added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2024
temospena added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant