Replies: 8 comments 4 replies
-
|
At this point, I don't even consider it a mod. I can't live without the custom stage size, Lily's toolbox, comments, and tons of other things. Turbowarp is most definitely it's own thing independent of scratch at this point, it's just scratch based, like how scratch is javascript based. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
obligatory "don't use lms utilities/lily's toolbox, use other extensions, they're better" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's mostly just that I know what everything is and I can't imagine using anything else at this point, plus it has stuff from a lot of other extensions that I don't wanna get individually and have to remember what they are and where to find them, etc |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i gotta agree. turbowarp is its own thing by now. At this point just drop
scratch compatibility and turn this into a game engine.
…On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 2:53 PM snowboyz0825 ***@***.***> wrote:
At this point, I don't even consider it a mod. I can't live without the
custom stage size, Lily's toolbox, comments, and tons of other things.
Turbowarp is most definitely it's own thing independent of scratch at this
point, it's just scratch based, like how scratch is javascript based.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1041 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANYWUKNUVCIHLRKLRLVPJG3X3CRFDANCNFSM6AAAAAA44DFWHI>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I always saw turbowarp as a game engine and not as a scratch mod |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
This is a good way to look at it! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i do agree, i look at it the same way, it would seem most people who use it often would most likely agree, but yeah i would like to see the "compatibility" factor be lessened seeing as the stuff we have now is not really "compatible".
…________________________________
From: NexusKitten ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 1:55 AM
To: TurboWarp/extensions ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [TurboWarp/extensions] Ship of Garbo Paradox (Discussion #1041)
How many features can we add to Turbowarp to the point when we can no longer call it a Scratch mod and it becomes it's own engine? Just some food for thought.
I'm not sure exactly what's Garbo's outlook on it at this point, however considering we're getting more features like custom reporters, custom fonts, etc, it feels like TurboWarp is more of it's own thing that just happens to be backwards compatible with Scratch. Scratch itself had so much potential, but the Scratch Team decided to market it as a learning platform and nothing more-- I see TurboWarp as an experiment of what happens when that silly mindset is removed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1041 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BAGGRIADFHAZ5GNGDX5XXKTX3EXVVANCNFSM6AAAAAA44DFWHI>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think at this point we could just make a seperate experimental fork that drops all Scratch compatibility and goes ham on all the best features, especially with the costume editor and handling sprite animations. I'd love to make it myself but I only have the most basic coding knowledge |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
many people have had this idea, i support it, i mean garbo owns unsandboxed.org(i think its .org)
…________________________________
From: gomiigg ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 11:49 AM
To: TurboWarp/extensions ***@***.***>
Cc: Surv ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [TurboWarp/extensions] Ship of Garbo Paradox (Discussion #1041)
I think at this point we could just make a seperate experimental fork that drops all Scratch compatibility and goes ham on all the best features, especially with the costume editor and handling sprite animations. I'd love to make it myself but I only have the most basic coding knowledge
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1041 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BAGGRIB3CW6TB4N2I4IZPITX3G5KNANCNFSM6AAAAAA44DFWHI>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
And to think that TurboWarp is still compatible with Scratch projects! (aside from custom extensions) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hot take: TurboWarp is still a Scratch mod, just a very customizable one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
How many features can we add to Turbowarp to the point when we can no longer call it a Scratch mod and it becomes it's own engine? Just some food for thought.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions