Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented tunnel payouts #3492

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 4, 2018
Merged

Implemented tunnel payouts #3492

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 4, 2018

Conversation

devos50
Copy link
Contributor

@devos50 devos50 commented Mar 4, 2018

In this PR, I implemented the payouts for the tunnel community. When destroying a 'regular' data circuit or an e2e circuit, the downloader pays the subsequent node in the form of bandwidth tokens. Note that this implementation is the most basic implementation possible and does not contain any sophisticated security/anonymity features.

Depends on Tribler/py-ipv8#67

Fixes #3493

@devos50 devos50 force-pushed the payouts3 branch 2 times, most recently from 92b8ae0 to 44b287b Compare March 4, 2018 14:55
@devos50 devos50 requested a review from qstokkink March 4, 2018 16:06
@devos50 devos50 changed the title WIP: Implemented tunnel payouts READY: Implemented tunnel payouts Mar 4, 2018
@devos50
Copy link
Contributor Author

devos50 commented Mar 4, 2018

@qstokkink ready for review. I think the missing lines in the code coverage are acceptable :)

Copy link
Contributor

@qstokkink qstokkink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine, also no more notifier 🎉

@qstokkink qstokkink changed the title READY: Implemented tunnel payouts Implemented tunnel payouts Mar 4, 2018
@qstokkink qstokkink merged commit e7995d1 into Tribler:devel Mar 4, 2018
@devos50 devos50 deleted the payouts3 branch March 4, 2018 17:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants