Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added results reading function for CRESTJob #320

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

YHordijk
Copy link
Contributor

We are now able to read results from CRESTJob calculations. This means we now have rerun prevention for these jobs as well, which is good as they are often quite expensive to run.

@YHordijk YHordijk requested a review from SiebeLeDe October 10, 2024 10:13
@YHordijk YHordijk self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@YHordijk YHordijk linked an issue Oct 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

@SiebeLeDe SiebeLeDe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the large if/else block, it is clearer to use a mapping dict instead so that you don't get a huge block if you want to change more things. It can also help with performance since not all checks have to be done each time for checking the if/else statment.

See this video (mistake 3) for an example

@SiebeLeDe SiebeLeDe merged commit 33736b1 into main Nov 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@SiebeLeDe SiebeLeDe deleted the 316-rerun-prevention-for-crestjob branch November 11, 2024 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rerun prevention for CRESTJob
2 participants