Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

have dwn go through the svc endpoint #115

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

have dwn go through the svc endpoint #115

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

decentralgabe
Copy link
Member

should have caught this earlier. really we should think of the 'service' apis as all that are exposed to other services. storage should be internal to each service

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #115 (da796eb) into main (23ad921) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #115   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.20%   28.20%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1202     1202           
=======================================
  Hits          339      339           
  Misses        815      815           
  Partials       48       48           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

logrus.Debugf("getting manifest: %s", request.ManifestID)

gotManifest, err := s.manifestStorage.GetManifest(request.ManifestID)
gotManifest, err := s.manifest.GetManifest(manifest.GetManifestRequest{ID: request.ManifestID})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup this is exactly what I was thinking about doing for a clean up 2nd pass.

We can even delete the dwn/model.go file and use CreateManifestRequest in manifest too, but that may be too much mixing

@decentralgabe decentralgabe merged commit 90b2432 into main Sep 29, 2022
@decentralgabe decentralgabe deleted the adjust-dwn-svc branch September 29, 2022 15:59
decentralgabe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2022
…of-signing-ose-101

* origin/main:
  have dwn go through the svc endpoint (#115)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants