You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can your team make a clear and unambiguous statement on the PeakRDL website ( e.g. in the licensing section ) clarifying what license, if any, applies to the output generated by running the PeakRDL tools covered by GPL v3? My understanding is that the output of the program is not governed by the terms of the program's license. If that is the case, it would be helpful to clearly state that the customer owns all rights to the outputs generated by the PeakRDL tools on your website :)
Add a similar statement to what is described in regblock docs to the general PeakRDL docs.
Will need to clarify that this exemption only covers core PeakRDL components, and 3rd-party plugins may be licensed differently.
Alternatively, consider switching away from GPL and move to the more FOSS hardware-friendly Apache license, as it is less likely to spook the lawyers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in https://github.com/orgs/SystemRDL/discussions/184, @CodeStillBroken requested:
Add a similar statement to what is described in regblock docs to the general PeakRDL docs.
Will need to clarify that this exemption only covers core PeakRDL components, and 3rd-party plugins may be licensed differently.
Alternatively, consider switching away from GPL and move to the more FOSS hardware-friendly Apache license, as it is less likely to spook the lawyers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: