Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: biomass pseudo-reaction requirements #107

Closed
hongzhonglu opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

feat: biomass pseudo-reaction requirements #107

hongzhonglu opened this issue May 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement new field/feature fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release

Comments

@hongzhonglu
Copy link
Collaborator

hongzhonglu commented May 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

In the current yeastGEM, it lacks some specific cofactors and metal irons, which need to be added with the improvement of the model coverage when hundreds of new reactions will be added to the yeastGEM.
@hongzhonglu hongzhonglu added the enhancement new field/feature label May 15, 2018
@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez changed the title fix: growth objective function fix: biomass pseudo-reaction requirements May 15, 2018
@BenjaSanchez
Copy link
Contributor

@hongzhonglu sounds great! could you list those new requirements here? maybe we can get some help to check if they make sense or not from @SysBioChalmers/yeast

@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez changed the title fix: biomass pseudo-reaction requirements feat: biomass pseudo-reaction requirements May 18, 2018
@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez added the wip work in progress label Nov 1, 2018
@feiranl feiranl mentioned this issue Nov 1, 2018
Merged
3 tasks
@BenjaSanchez
Copy link
Contributor

update: this issue has been addressed in #174 and will be closed on the next release

@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez added fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release and removed wip work in progress labels Nov 16, 2018
@BenjaSanchez BenjaSanchez mentioned this issue Dec 4, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement new field/feature fixed in devel this issue is already fixed in devel and will be closed after the next release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@BenjaSanchez @hongzhonglu