Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add readme #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Add readme #1

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

hlydecker
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@hlydecker hlydecker merged commit 55aab2a into main Feb 1, 2024
@hlydecker hlydecker deleted the content-readme-init branch February 1, 2024 08:56
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./README.md 31.78 0.00 88
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.25 20.82 6393

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

1 similar comment
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./README.md 31.78 0.00 88
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.25 20.82 6393

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

2 similar comments
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.19 0.00 102
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.77 6407

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.25 0.00 96
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.30 20.79 6401

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

1 similar comment
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.25 0.00 96
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.30 20.79 6401

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

2 similar comments
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./scripts/vit_predict.py 16.46 15.19 54
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.31 20.78 6402

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 19.05 39.68 26
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.96 6424

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6529

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

1 similar comment
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.46 0.00 97
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6529

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

3 similar comments
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 34.44 0.00 99
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.35 20.86 6531

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 35.53 0.00 98
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.37 20.85 6530

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

1 similar comment
Copy link

comment-to-code-ratio analysis report for the last push 🎉

File blank % comment % code
./scripts/make_mask.py 12.50 23.28 411
./scripts/osm_cleaner.py 16.59 20.10 397
./scripts/batch_geojson2coco.py 16.01 14.50 369
./scripts/coco2geojson.py 14.31 19.45 361
./scripts/density_map.py 14.71 21.96 297
./scripts/aigis_eda.py 24.79 25.21 234
./aigis/segment/utils.py 17.37 28.04 220
./scripts/sa1.py 19.85 23.45 220
./aigis/convert/coco.py 22.44 29.33 217
./scripts/coco_balance.py 16.09 16.40 214
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2_from_roboflow.py 10.40 29.36 197
./aigis/convert/tiles.py 19.46 23.95 189
./scripts/fine_tuning_detectron2.py 9.79 24.13 189
./scripts/geojson2coco.py 11.67 17.12 183
./scripts/prediction_raster_detectron2.py 13.96 9.91 169
./aigis/convert/orthogonalise/orthogonalise.py 18.64 33.90 168
./docs/segment.md 36.64 5.73 151
./scripts/benchmark.cpp 12.77 13.30 139
./scripts/prediction_batch_detectron2.py 11.66 8.59 130
./scripts/coco_split.py 20.38 3.82 119
./scripts/vit_finetune.py 21.85 0.66 117
./docs/convert.md 36.28 13.02 109
./scripts/get_raster_jpeg.py 14.29 11.56 109
./aigis/convert/coordinates.py 21.77 36.69 103
./README.md 35.53 0.00 98
./sphinx-docs/index.rst 36.41 17.48 95
./scripts/benchmark.py 14.16 7.96 88
./scripts/jpeg2tiff.py 11.93 9.17 86
./aigis/annotate/utils.py 17.52 24.82 79
./aigis/convert/COCO_validator.py 11.63 3.49 73
./scripts/prediction_detectron2.py 14.94 3.45 71
./docs/annotate.md 37.59 18.80 58
./aigis/segment/eval.py 19.47 30.09 57
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.rst 26.49 36.42 56
./aigis/segment/postprocess.py 22.62 15.48 52
./scripts/tif_split.py 17.05 26.14 50
./pyproject.toml 6.00 0.00 47
./scripts/vit_predict.py 18.67 21.33 45
./sphinx-docs/scripts.rst 24.85 48.48 44
./aigis/convert/utils.py 24.07 37.04 42
./sphinx-docs/aigis.segment.rst 38.46 29.23 42
./requirements.txt 0.00 0.00 36
./scripts/download_raster.py 22.22 22.22 35
./scripts/poc_gradio.py 19.70 28.79 34
./aigis/segment/models.py 22.50 38.75 31
./sphinx-docs/aigis.annotate.rst 36.49 21.62 31
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md 21.05 0.00 30
./scripts/README.md 35.56 0.00 29
./.pre-commit-config.yaml 0.00 0.00 28
./aigis/utils/analysis.py 23.40 19.15 27
./tests/test_extract_output_annotations.py 25.58 13.95 26
./scripts/predict_area.py 21.62 10.81 25
./.github/workflows/main.yml 13.04 0.00 20
./sphinx-docs/aigis.other.rst 47.73 15.91 16
./.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md 25.00 0.00 15
./sphinx-docs/conf.py 25.45 50.91 13
./scripts/CMakeLists.txt 14.29 7.14 11
./sphinx-docs/Makefile 20.00 35.00 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.convert.orthogonalise.rst 26.09 34.78 9
./sphinx-docs/aigis.rst 25.00 45.00 6
./docs/README.md 33.33 0.00 2
./sphinx-docs/modules.rst 22.22 55.56 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
SUM: 19.37 20.85 6530

Horribly commented code averages 0-5% comment ratio.
Poorly commented code has a 5-10% comment ratio.
Average code has a 10-15% comment ratio.
Good code has a 15-25% comment ratio.
Excellent code has a > 25% comment ratio.

Use this action on your projects to generate a report like this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant