Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove price impact filter from ExactIn trades #1927

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

Diogomartf
Copy link
Collaborator

@Diogomartf Diogomartf commented Oct 2, 2024

Description

Remove price impact filters from trades, this is blocking some tokens who have diff price impact rules, we should probably do a more robust solution if we want to filter on price impact.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for swapr ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 82f29a6
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/swapr/deploys/66fd4e618ca3900008ac3772
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1927--swapr.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 25
Accessibility: 79
Best Practices: 92
SEO: 83
PWA: 80
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@Diogomartf Diogomartf force-pushed the try-removing-unsortedTrades branch from 53021c9 to 82f29a6 Compare October 2, 2024 13:45
@Diogomartf Diogomartf changed the title remove filters from trades remove price impact filter from ExactIn trades Oct 2, 2024
@berteotti
Copy link
Collaborator

If this code is hurting us, I think we should remove. Probably better to show all the answers, that way users know that there is an option from X, Y or Z AMM.

@Diogomartf Diogomartf merged commit 0c63028 into develop Oct 17, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants