Issueid #230114 feat: accessing data from morigal to cloudfrontIssuei… #208
Conversation
…d #230114 feat: accessing data from morigal to cloudfront
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/App.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/App.js (3)
1-11: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized
The imports are properly structured and all dependencies appear to be necessary for the component's functionality.
104-112: LGTM! Component rendering follows best practices
The component structure is clean and properly implements Material-UI theming and routing.
74-94: Verify implementation aligns with PR objectives
The PR title mentions "accessing data from morigal to cloudfront", but the implementation only shows storing tokens and IDs from window messages. Please clarify:
- How is the data flow from Morigal to CloudFront implemented?
- Are there any specific security requirements for this data flow?
- Should we add any logging or error tracking for monitoring this integration?
| if (localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2") !== null) { | ||
| let fpDetails_v2 = localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2"); | ||
| did = fpDetails_v2.result; | ||
| } else { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential runtime error in fingerprint details access
There's a potential runtime error when accessing fpDetails_v2.result as the value from localStorage is not parsed from JSON string to object.
Apply this fix:
if (localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2") !== null) {
- let fpDetails_v2 = localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2");
+ let fpDetails_v2 = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2"));
did = fpDetails_v2.result;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2") !== null) { | |
| let fpDetails_v2 = localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2"); | |
| did = fpDetails_v2.result; | |
| } else { | |
| if (localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2") !== null) { | |
| let fpDetails_v2 = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem("fpDetails_v2")); | |
| did = fpDetails_v2.result; | |
| } else { |
src/App.js
Outdated
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| const handleMessage = (event) => { | ||
| // Destructure the message data | ||
| const { token, buddyToken, messageType, contentSessionId, virtualId } = | ||
| event.data; | ||
|
|
||
| // Check if the expected data exists | ||
| if (messageType === "customData") { | ||
| if (token) { | ||
| localStorage.setItem("token", token); | ||
| } | ||
| if (buddyToken) { | ||
| localStorage.setItem("buddyToken", buddyToken); | ||
| } | ||
| if (contentSessionId) { | ||
| localStorage.setItem("contentSessionId", contentSessionId); | ||
| } | ||
| if (virtualId) { | ||
| localStorage.setItem("virtualId", virtualId); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| window.addEventListener("message", handleMessage); | ||
|
|
||
| return () => { | ||
| window.removeEventListener("message", handleMessage); | ||
| }; | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add security measures and error handling to message listener
The current implementation has several security and robustness concerns:
- Messages are accepted from any origin without validation
- No validation of data types or structures
- Missing error handling for malformed data
Consider implementing these safety measures:
useEffect(() => {
const handleMessage = (event) => {
+ // Validate message origin
+ const trustedOrigins = [process.env.REACT_APP_TRUSTED_ORIGIN];
+ if (!trustedOrigins.includes(event.origin)) {
+ console.warn(`Rejected message from untrusted origin: ${event.origin}`);
+ return;
+ }
+ try {
const { token, buddyToken, messageType, contentSessionId, virtualId } =
event.data;
// Validate data types
+ if (typeof messageType !== 'string' ||
+ (token && typeof token !== 'string') ||
+ (buddyToken && typeof buddyToken !== 'string')) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid data types in message');
+ }
if (messageType === "customData") {
if (token) {
localStorage.setItem("token", token);
}
if (buddyToken) {
localStorage.setItem("buddyToken", buddyToken);
}
if (contentSessionId) {
localStorage.setItem("contentSessionId", contentSessionId);
}
if (virtualId) {
localStorage.setItem("virtualId", virtualId);
}
}
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Error processing message:', error);
+ }
};
window.addEventListener("message", handleMessage);
return () => {
window.removeEventListener("message", handleMessage);
};
}, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const handleMessage = (event) => { | |
| // Destructure the message data | |
| const { token, buddyToken, messageType, contentSessionId, virtualId } = | |
| event.data; | |
| // Check if the expected data exists | |
| if (messageType === "customData") { | |
| if (token) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("token", token); | |
| } | |
| if (buddyToken) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("buddyToken", buddyToken); | |
| } | |
| if (contentSessionId) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("contentSessionId", contentSessionId); | |
| } | |
| if (virtualId) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("virtualId", virtualId); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener("message", handleMessage); | |
| return () => { | |
| window.removeEventListener("message", handleMessage); | |
| }; | |
| }, []); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| const handleMessage = (event) => { | |
| // Validate message origin | |
| const trustedOrigins = [process.env.REACT_APP_TRUSTED_ORIGIN]; | |
| if (!trustedOrigins.includes(event.origin)) { | |
| console.warn(`Rejected message from untrusted origin: ${event.origin}`); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const { token, buddyToken, messageType, contentSessionId, virtualId } = | |
| event.data; | |
| // Validate data types | |
| if (typeof messageType !== 'string' || | |
| (token && typeof token !== 'string') || | |
| (buddyToken && typeof buddyToken !== 'string')) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid data types in message'); | |
| } | |
| if (messageType === "customData") { | |
| if (token) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("token", token); | |
| } | |
| if (buddyToken) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("buddyToken", buddyToken); | |
| } | |
| if (contentSessionId) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("contentSessionId", contentSessionId); | |
| } | |
| if (virtualId) { | |
| localStorage.setItem("virtualId", virtualId); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Error processing message:', error); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| window.addEventListener("message", handleMessage); | |
| return () => { | |
| window.removeEventListener("message", handleMessage); | |
| }; | |
| }, []); |
|
gouravmore
changed the base branch from
all-1.3-tn-dev
to
all-1.3-tn-dev-hotfix
…-tn-dev Issueid #230114 feat: accessing data from morigal to cloudfrontIssuei…
…d #230114 feat: accessing data from morigal to cloudfront
Summary by CodeRabbit