Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is there a reason literate coffeescript's function matcher doesn't include functions starting with @? #214

Closed
redders6600 opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

Is there a reason literate coffeescript's function matcher doesn't include functions starting with @? #214

redders6600 opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@redders6600
Copy link

The coffeescript language definition matcher for meta.function.coffee allows functions that start with @, but the litcoffee one does not.

I was just wondering if there's any reason for this or if this was something that was overlooked.
deathaxe added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2024
@deathaxe
Refactor syntax
38697ca 
Fixes #128
Fixes #153
Fixes #203
Fixes #212
Fixes #214
Fixes #215
Fixes #221
Fixes #248
Fixes #250
Fixes #252
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@redders6600 @deathaxe