-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ongoing Minor Issue List (SpongeAPI Edition) #1000
Comments
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Harris-Rouquette <[email protected]>
Fixes JavaDoc issues in #1000; removes implements DataSerializable from ItemStack
…rom ItemStack DataHolder already extends DataSerializable.
…ear old todo. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Harris-Rouquette <[email protected]>
https://jd.spongepowered.org/7.2.0/org/spongepowered/api/item/inventory/Inventory.html#offer-org.spongepowered.api.item.inventory.ItemStack- has a very confusing javadoc. It says it returns |
Should be SpongeAPI/src/main/java/org/spongepowered/api/command/parameter/managed/ValueParameter.java Line 107 in 4f58aeb
SpongeAPI/src/main/java/org/spongepowered/api/command/parameter/managed/ValueParameter.java Lines 102 to 103 in 4f58aeb
|
Link to docs should be: https://docs.spongepowered.org/stable/en/contributing/guidelines.html Line 5 in 1a5f417
|
The minimum Java version for API 9 is 17, but the README on the api-9 branch states otherwise: |
This method doesn't need a generic. API 8+ SpongeAPI/src/main/java/org/spongepowered/api/effect/particle/ParticleEffect.java Lines 167 to 169 in 7946be0
|
SpongeAPI | Sponge
Checkstyle issues should not be reported here as those can be more accurately determined by simply running the checkstyle tool. Examples of good issues to report here are misnamed methods/fields, poorly worded javadocs, formatting issues.
As minor things are resolved, comments will be deleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: