feat: mdoc selectFrom, evaluation and parsing

[TimoGlastra]

This PR adds support for parsing and evaluation of mdoc. It builds on the already existing work that was done, but now also adds tests and makes sure it works correctly for the following methods:

• evaluatePresentation
• selectFrom
• validateDefinition

I added a new Mdoc.spec.ts file that adds tests from these methods, as well as combining it with sd-jwt. So it allows doing combined presentation evaluation which will be useful for integration into oid4vp :)

I also added some extra checks in the submission extraction logic, as it allowed e.g. path $ while the presentations would be an array messing with the querying. It is now stricter but I tried adding helpful error messages.

One suggestion on making the API more aligned is that if the presentationSubmision returned in the presetnation result uses $ i don't think the presentations should be an array, but rather a single entry. As it now doesn't always match. Because i think if there's only one entry it will always just us $, but still return an array. If you then pass that into the evaluation it will fail (because you try to access $ in an array, selecting the whole array)

Depends on Sphereon-Opensource/SSI-SDK#262, so once that is merged I'll update the dep and release this. There will be another final PR to oid4vp that will integrate this work as well and remove the logic that now bypasses pex!

The only thing for the OID4VP stuff is that we need to fix the deviceSigned parsing to be able to extract the correct nonce

[sanderPostma]

@TimoGlastra
Can you please rebase against our branch feature/mdoc-parsing
I see changes in the multi-vp behaviour so I want to run all the tests in multiple projects before merging this. (I have another branch which has better tests for multi-vp sd-jwt)

[sanderPostma]

ssi-sdk version is 0.30.2-next.129

[TimoGlastra]

I can also split out the multi-vp handling, as it's not required for the mdoc stuff. Just something i ran into while writing the tests. Would that have your preference?

[sanderPostma]

Would that have your preference?
Will merge & test now. If the tests are passing it's fine. Otherwise I will revert those and let you know.

[TimoGlastra]

okay removed it before you merged, so her's a pr that adds it back in: #182