Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add new CppCheck rules (V1.69 Dev) #503

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2015
Merged

add new CppCheck rules (V1.69 Dev) #503

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
77 changes: 75 additions & 2 deletions sonar-cxx-plugin/src/main/resources/cppcheck.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Follow these steps to make your custom Custom rules available in SonarQube:
<li>Create a new rule in SonarQube by "copying" this rule template and specify the <code>CheckId</code> of your custom rule, a title, a description, and a default severity.</li>
<li>Enable the newly created rule in your quality profile</li>
</ol>
<li>Relaunch an analysis on your projects, et voil�, your custom rules are executed!</li>
<li>Relaunch an analysis on your projects, et voila, your custom rules are executed!</li>
</ol>
]]>
</description>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1022,7 +1022,7 @@ Follow these steps to make your custom Custom rules available in SonarQube:
<rule>
<key>sizeofwithsilentarraypointer</key>
<configkey>sizeofwithsilentarraypointer</configkey>
<name>Using sizeof for array given as function argument returns the size of pointer</name>
<name>Using sizeof on array given as function argument returns the size of pointer</name>
<description>
Using &apos;sizeof&apos; for array given as function argument returns the size of pointer.
</description>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2858,6 +2858,79 @@ Follow these steps to make your custom Custom rules available in SonarQube:
&apos;arg1&apos; given to va_start() is not last named argument of the function. Did you intend to pass &apos;arg2&apos;?.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>unmatchedSuppression</key>
<configkey>unmatchedSuppression</configkey>
<name>Unmatched suppression: unusedFunction</name>
<description>
Unmatched suppression: unusedFunction.
</description>
</rule>
<!-- ########### New in cppcheck 1.69 Dev ########### -->
<rule>
<key>duplicateExpressionTernary</key>
<configkey>duplicateExpressionTernary</configkey>
<name>Same expression in both branches of ternary operator</name>
<description>
Same expression in both branches of ternary operator.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>noExplicitConstructor</key>
<configkey>noExplicitConstructor</configkey>
<name>Class has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit</name>
<description>
Class &apos;classname&apos; has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>noExplicitCopyMoveConstructor</key>
<configkey>noExplicitCopyMoveConstructor</configkey>
<name>Abstract class has a copy/move constructor that is not explicit</name>
<description>
Abstract class &apos;classname&apos; has a copy/move constructor that is not explicit.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>operatorEqMissingReturnStatement</key>
<configkey>operatorEqMissingReturnStatement</configkey>
<name>Missing &apos;return&apos; statement in non-void function causes undefined behavior</name>
<description>
No &apos;return&apos; statement in non-void function causes undefined behavior.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>operatorEqShouldBeLeftUnimplemented</key>
<configkey>operatorEqShouldBeLeftUnimplemented</configkey>
<name>&apos;operator=&apos; should either return reference to &apos;this&apos;</name>
<description>
&apos;operator=&apos; should either return reference to &apos;this&apos; instance or be declared private and left unimplemented.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>redundantPointerOp</key>
<configkey>redundantPointerOp</configkey>
<name>Redundant pointer operation on varname</name>
<description>
Redundant pointer operation on varname - it&apos;s already a pointer.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>throwInNoexceptFunction</key>
<configkey>throwInNoexceptFunction</configkey>
<name>Exception thrown in function declared not to throw exceptions</name>
<description>
Exception thrown in function declared not to throw exceptions.
</description>
</rule>
<rule>
<key>useAutoPointerMalloc</key>
<configkey>useAutoPointerMalloc</configkey>
<name>Object pointed by an &apos;auto_ptr&apos; is destroyed using operator &apos;delete&apos;</name>
<description>
Object pointed by an &apos;auto_ptr&apos; is destroyed using operator &apos;delete&apos;. You should not use &apos;auto_ptr&apos; for pointers obtained with function &apos;malloc&apos;.
</description>
</rule>
</rules>


Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion ...xx-plugin/src/test/java/org/sonar/plugins/cxx/cppcheck/CxxCppCheckRuleRepositoryTest.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ public void createRulesTest() {
def.define(context);

RulesDefinition.Repository repo = context.repository(CxxCppCheckRuleRepository.KEY);
assertEquals(324, repo.rules().size());
assertEquals(333, repo.rules().size());
}
}