Slicer creating geometry inside infill underneath the actual geometry #2645
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
|
Update - if I increase the number of bottom layers to be equal to the layer immediately before the color change / where the geometry SHOULD start, I can get the slice to only have ONE layer of geometry in the infill - which is workable.
|
|
When I open the 3mf it says the file does not contain any geometry data. Could you reupload the project file? |
|
I saved the project again - please let me know if this one works. |
|
Yep that works. |
|
Will do - standby
…On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:26 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
Yep that works.
For now you can disable the "Detect narrow internal solid infill" and
"Ensure vertical shell thickness" which should greatly improve the quality
(but the "Only one wall on top surfaces" still won't work well).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2645 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYLTQYK5OXWG3OSXNALYEDE75AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGEZDQNBRHA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Ouch - that actually made it worse.
Making the bottom layers >= the start of the new geometry works the best.
…On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:32 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
Will do - standby
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 8:26 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
> Yep that works.
>
> For now you can disable the "Detect narrow internal solid infill" and
> "Ensure vertical shell thickness" which should greatly improve the quality
> (but the "Only one wall on top surfaces" still won't work well).
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#2645 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYLTQYK5OXWG3OSXNALYEDE75AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGEZDQNBRHA>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
|
Yeah I noticed. Your model is actually a great benchmark for testing slicing thing but complicated objects, and I've so far noticed a few more other types of defects (when playing with different settings), comparing to BBS and SS. Some of the changes that ported from PS actually causes these issues, and I'll see if I could improve them. Examples of some other defects: |
|
Nice!
Glad to assist - let me know how I can contribute
…On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
Yeah I noticed. Your model is actually a great benchmark for testing
slicing thing but complicated objects, and I've so far noticed a few more
other types of defects, comparing to BBS and SS. Will try fixing each of
them.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2645 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYODRN7O3G4QRQLOF3TYEDUNBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGE3DENBZGI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Are you able to give this build a try and see if that improves the quality? https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/actions/runs/6846552190 |
|
This works properly!
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:30 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
Are you able to give this build a try and see if that improves the
quality? https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/actions/runs/6846552190
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2645 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYLMYU4SKPPPTUKWM33YEHLD3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGY3TCMBZGY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Note - I still have to set the infill to 100% - if I set it lower - I see
the geometry inside the lower layers still - but I can work around that
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:55 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
This works properly!
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:30 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
> Are you able to give this build a try and see if that improves the
> quality? https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/actions/runs/6846552190
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#2645 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYLMYU4SKPPPTUKWM33YEHLD3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGY3TCMBZGY>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
Yeah I'm aware of this. Those are different issues though and I'm still investigating. |
|
Very good!
Please let me know how I can assist.
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 8:00 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
Note - I still have to set the infill to 100% - if I set it lower - I see
the geometry inside the lower layers still - but I can work around that
… <#m_-4653090992469848474_>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 7:55 AM Mark Steele *@*.*> wrote: This works
properly! On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:30 AM Noisyfox @.*> wrote: > Are you
able to give this build a try and see if that improves the > quality?
https://github.com/SoftFever/OrcaSlicer/actions/runs/6846552190 > > — >
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#2645 (comment)
<#2645 (comment)>>,
> or unsubscribe >
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYLMYU4SKPPPTUKWM33YEHLD3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBXGY3TCMBZGY
> . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: >
*@*.***> >
Yeah I'm aware of this. Those are different issues though and I'm still
investigating.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2645 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYPTYALWZKDXLGSDIVDYEIKWPAVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGEZDCMBSG4>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Another tip: |
|
testing!
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***> wrote:
Another tip:
Set "One wall threshold" to 0 while "Only one wall on top surfaces" turned
on will remove the scars on the surface.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2645 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYL444J25DWEELD3PATYEI5E3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGM4TQOJSGA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Which of these is one wall threshold? I assume by '0' you mean unchecked?
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:44 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
testing!
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Another tip:
> Set "One wall threshold" to 0 while "Only one wall on top surfaces"
> turned on will remove the scars on the surface.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#2645 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYL444J25DWEELD3PATYEI5E3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGM4TQOJSGA>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
|
[image: image.png]
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
Which of these is one wall threshold? I assume by '0' you mean unchecked?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:44 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
> testing!
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> Another tip:
>> Set "One wall threshold" to 0 while "Only one wall on top surfaces"
>> turned on will remove the scars on the surface.
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#2645 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYL444J25DWEELD3PATYEI5E3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGM4TQOJSGA>
>> .
>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>> ***@***.***>
>>
>
|
|
Nevermind - I see it - have to select it first to get the threshold
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
[image: image.png]
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
> Which of these is one wall threshold? I assume by '0' you mean unchecked?
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:44 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> testing!
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Another tip:
>>> Set "One wall threshold" to 0 while "Only one wall on top surfaces"
>>> turned on will remove the scars on the surface.
>>>
>>> —
>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>> <#2645 (comment)>,
>>> or unsubscribe
>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYL444J25DWEELD3PATYEI5E3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGM4TQOJSGA>
>>> .
>>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>>> ***@***.***>
>>>
>>
|
|
That still leaves one layer with the next geometry being printed even
though it should be a solid top layer :-(
[image: image.png]
…On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:49 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
Nevermind - I see it - have to select it first to get the threshold
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***> wrote:
> [image: image.png]
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> Which of these is one wall threshold? I assume by '0' you mean unchecked?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:44 AM Mark Steele ***@***.***>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> testing!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:37 AM Noisyfox ***@***.***>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another tip:
>>>> Set "One wall threshold" to 0 while "Only one wall on top surfaces"
>>>> turned on will remove the scars on the surface.
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>>> <#2645 (comment)>,
>>>> or unsubscribe
>>>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABRMUYL444J25DWEELD3PATYEI5E3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA7BHWPNKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMBYGM4TQOJSGA>
>>>> .
>>>> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>>>> ***@***.***>
>>>>
>>>
|
|
Hmmmm unfortunately your images are all broken, though I guess I know what you're talking about. |
2 tasks
Setting One wall threshold to
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
OrcaSlicer Version
1.8.0 beta 2
OS version
Windows 11 Home
Additional system information
No response
Printer
Bambu Lab X1cc
How to reproduce
First two images are v1.7.0 - remaining images are 1.8.0 beta 2 (also happened in beta 2)
1.8.0 beta 2
Actual results
this creates issues when printing - lots of retractions and slower printing due to printing geometry that will never be seen and is not needed for support.
Expected results
just print smooth 100% infill layers until the actual geometry is reached.
I have inspected the model in Fusion using sectional analysis and the geometry is not overlapping - they sketches are created on top of the main surface and extruded upwards.
Project file & Debug log uploads
log.zip
geometry_inside_infill.zip
Checklist of files to include
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: