Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving AtClient to a separate library. #2497

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2022

Conversation

slaff
Copy link
Contributor

@slaff slaff commented Mar 30, 2022

Adding a sample (related to #1527).

@slaff slaff added this to the 4.6.0 milestone Mar 30, 2022
@slaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

slaff commented Mar 30, 2022

@mikee47 I am thinking that maybe AtClient can be completely rewritten to use your IO Control library.

@slaff slaff requested a review from mikee47 March 30, 2022 13:26
@mikee47
Copy link
Contributor

mikee47 commented Mar 31, 2022

@mikee47 I am thinking that maybe AtClient can be completely rewritten to use your IO Control library.

@slaff Probably a good fit as it's a bit like modbus with a structured command/response. Modems are particularly interesting since they all do a similar job, use AT commands but don't always implement them consistently! This might be accommodated using a basic AT IOControl::device which can be configured with fixed (i.e. flash-based) mappings for various device types.

Copy link
Contributor

@mikee47 mikee47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine. I am interested in adding GSM modem support to the IOControl library, though I'm in the middle of a solar power installation ATM. Feel free to have a go!

Introduction
------------

AT commands were initially instructions used to control a modem. AT is the abbreviation of ATtention. Every command line starts with "AT" or "at".
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants