Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider setting up Homebrew distribution via a tap #43

Closed
rnorth opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #85
Closed

Consider setting up Homebrew distribution via a tap #43

rnorth opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #85

Comments

@rnorth
Copy link
Collaborator

rnorth commented Apr 30, 2021

The installation instructions could be simplified greatly if we use Homebrew for distribution. Per discussions, it would be good to set up a private tap and configure goreleaser to keep it up to date.

We need to ensure that MacOS distribution works without Gatekeeper problems; I don't think that signing/notarizing the binaries should be required for brew installs, but this needs verification.

@rnorth rnorth added help wanted Extra attention is needed and removed help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Apr 30, 2021
@sledigabel
Copy link
Contributor

I think it's time to make it an official formula.
Perhaps even github pages.

@rnorth rnorth changed the title Consider setting up Homebrew distribution via a private tap Consider setting up Homebrew distribution via a tap Oct 18, 2022
rnorth added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2022
Fixes #43

Will cause each released version to have a formula pushed to Skyscanner/homebrew-tools
rnorth added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2022
Fixes #43

Will cause each released version to have a formula pushed to Skyscanner/homebrew-tools
@rnorth rnorth closed this as completed in #85 Nov 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants