The output files generated by AutoGPT is almost empty, though have costed GPT API fee a lot. #1783
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
I got a same question !!!!!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The same. The script ran successfully, but I'm not finding the result. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
after only a few attempts. i noticed the same thing. the output files would commonly be empty. so after the first 'activity' by auto gpt. it would say it's done something and the output you could tell would be blank. and i would reply to it saying " the write_to_file command seems to be blank" and auto gpt would go back and basically notice that and re-do the action and this time the file would contain content just as you would expect...after this i would put it on continuous mode for X passes. rarely would i just let it go on it's own. i wanna check in after like 10 passes and make sure it's doing what it's supposed to be. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Same here...Im a lower mid-level linux guy...YESSIR - I can alias the sh*t out of: alias=aa'suto apt update & sudo apt upgrade -y' AND I got docker working! (Yay me!).... But sigh, I cant seem to find the output files either? I do see the "write_to_file" and I messed with the volume setting in yaml but I always put it back to the orig and assume it me doing it wrong... Im hoping this is an old thread and Im doing something stupid? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The output files mainly located in folder called "auto_gpt_workspace". Those files sum up to 30kb.
The working cache could be stored in file "auto-gpt.json", which is several Mbs.
And it costed 6 dollars of GPT API fee.
Is there anything wrong that i couldn't get the content generated by autogpt into a readable file?
Please help!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions