This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 7, 2024. It is now read-only.
Save IPFS_CLIENT correctly #99
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
IPFS_CLIENT is saved correctly now.
The problem was how we called
initIPFSClientwhich resulted inglobal.IPFS_CLIENTbeingundefined, hence, the remotes were initializing IPFS client themselves instead of sharing the instance from the main process. Which should work (and sometimes does after you trigger some other API call, like adding a file), but not always because of the remotes not usingpromiseIPFSReadyafter init, like we use inindex.jsThis fixes: https://dev.siderus.team/issues/119