✨ https://zod.dev ✨
TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
These docs have been translated into Chinese.
- Introduction
- Installation
- Basic usage
- Primitives
- Literals
- Strings
- Numbers
- NaNs
- Booleans
- Dates
- Zod enums
- Native enums
- Optionals
- Nullables
- Objects
- Arrays
- Tuples
- Unions
- Discriminated Unions
- Records
- Maps
- Sets
- Recursive types
- Promises
- Instanceof
- Function schemas
- Preprocess
- Branded types
- Schema methods
- Guides and concepts
- Comparison
- Changelog
Zod is a TypeScript-first schema declaration and validation library. I'm using the term "schema" to broadly refer to any data type, from a simple string
to a complex nested object.
Zod is designed to be as developer-friendly as possible. The goal is to eliminate duplicative type declarations. With Zod, you declare a validator once and Zod will automatically infer the static TypeScript type. It's easy to compose simpler types into complex data structures.
Some other great aspects:
- Zero dependencies
- Works in Node.js and all modern browsers
- Tiny: 8kb minified + zipped
- Immutable: methods (i.e.
.optional()
) return a new instance - Concise, chainable interface
- Functional approach: parse, don't validate
- Works with plain JavaScript too! You don't need to use TypeScript.
Sponsorship at any level is appreciated and encouraged. For individual developers, consider the Cup of Coffee tier. If you built a paid product using Zod, consider one of the podium tiers.
Astro astro.build
Astro is a new kind of static |
Glow Wallet glow.app Your new favorite
|
Deletype deletype.com |
Snaplet snaplet.dev |
Marcato Partners marcatopartners.com |
Trip |
Seasoned Software seasoned.cc |
Interval interval.com |
Brandon Bayer @flybayer, creator of Blitz.js |
Jiří Brabec @brabeji |
Alex Johansson @alexdotjs |
Adaptable adaptable.io |
Avana Wallet avanawallet.com Solana non-custodial wallet |
There are a growing number of tools that are built atop or support Zod natively! If you've built a tool or library on top of Zod, tell me about it on Twitter or start a Discussion. I'll add it below and tweet it out.
tRPC
: Build end-to-end typesafe APIs without GraphQL.ts-to-zod
: Convert TypeScript definitions into Zod schemas.zod-to-ts
: Generate TypeScript definitions from Zod schemas.@anatine/zod-openapi
: Converts a Zod schema to an OpenAPI v3.xSchemaObject
.@anatine/zod-mock
: Generate mock data from a Zod schema. Powered by faker.js.@anatine/zod-nestjs
: Helper methods for using Zod in a NestJS project.zod-mocking
: Generate mock data from your Zod schemas.zod-fast-check
: Generatefast-check
arbitraries from Zod schemas.zod-endpoints
: Contract-first strictly typed endpoints with Zod. OpenAPI compatible.express-zod-api
: Build Express-based APIs with I/O schema validation and custom middlewares.zod-to-json-schema
: Convert your Zod schemas into JSON Schemas.json-schema-to-zod
: Convert your JSON Schemas into Zod schemas. Live demo.json-to-zod
: Convert JSON objects into Zod schemas. Live demo.zod-dto
: Generate Nest.js DTOs from a Zod schema.soly
: Create CLI applications with zod.graphql-codegen-typescript-validation-schema
: GraphQL Code Generator plugin to generate form validation schema from your GraphQL schemazod-prisma
: Generate Zod schemas from your Prisma schema.fastify-type-provider-zod
: Create Fastify type providers from Zod schemasSupervillain
: Generate Zod schemas from your Go structszod-to-openapi
: Generate full OpenAPI (Swagger) docs from Zod, including schemas, endpoints & parametersprisma-zod-generator
: Emit Zod schemas from your Prisma schema.prisma-trpc-generator
: Emit fully implemented tRPC routers and their validation schemas using Zod.nestjs-graphql-zod
: Generates NestJS GraphQL model classes from Zod schemas dynamically and provides GraphQL method decorators working with Zod schemas.zod-xlsx
: A xlsx based resource validator using Zod schemas.remix-domains
: Improves end-to-end type safety in Remix by leveraging Zod to parse the framework's inputs such as FormData, URLSearchParams, etc.@zodios/core
: A typescript API client with runtime and compile time validation backed by axios and zod.@runtyping/zod
: Generate zod from static types & JSON schema.
react-hook-form
: A first-party Zod resolver for React Hook Formzod-formik-adapter
: A community-maintained Formik adapter for Zodreact-zorm
: Standalone<form>
generation and validation for React using Zod
-
TypeScript 4.1+!
-
You must enable
strict
mode in yourtsconfig.json
. This is a best practice for all TypeScript projects.// tsconfig.json { // ... "compilerOptions": { // ... "strict": true } }
To install Zod v3:
npm install zod # npm
yarn add zod # yarn
pnpm add zod # pnpm
Unlike Node, Deno relies on direct URL imports instead of a package manager like NPM. Zod is available on deno.land/x. The latest version can be imported like so:
import { z } from "https://deno.land/x/zod/mod.ts";
You can also specify a particular version:
import { z } from "https://deno.land/x/[email protected]/mod.ts";
The rest of this README assumes you are using npm and importing directly from the
"zod"
package.
Creating a simple string schema
import { z } from "zod";
// creating a schema for strings
const mySchema = z.string();
// parsing
mySchema.parse("tuna"); // => "tuna"
mySchema.parse(12); // => throws ZodError
// "safe" parsing (doesn't throw error if validation fails)
mySchema.safeParse("tuna"); // => { success: true; data: "tuna" }
mySchema.safeParse(12); // => { success: false; error: ZodError }
Creating an object schema
import { z } from "zod";
const User = z.object({
username: z.string(),
});
User.parse({ username: "Ludwig" });
// extract the inferred type
type User = z.infer<typeof User>;
// { username: string }
import { z } from "zod";
// primitive values
z.string();
z.number();
z.bigint();
z.boolean();
z.date();
// empty types
z.undefined();
z.null();
z.void(); // accepts undefined
// catch-all types
// allows any value
z.any();
z.unknown();
// never type
// allows no values
z.never();
const tuna = z.literal("tuna");
const twelve = z.literal(12);
const tru = z.literal(true);
// retrieve literal value
tuna.value; // "tuna"
Currently there is no support for Date literals in Zod. If you have a use case for this feature, please file an issue.
Zod includes a handful of string-specific validations.
z.string().max(5);
z.string().min(5);
z.string().length(5);
z.string().email();
z.string().url();
z.string().uuid();
z.string().cuid();
z.string().regex(regex);
z.string().startsWith(string);
z.string().endsWith(string);
// trim whitespace
z.string().trim();
// deprecated, equivalent to .min(1)
z.string().nonempty();
// optional custom error message
z.string().nonempty({ message: "Can't be empty" });
Check out validator.js for a bunch of other useful string validation functions.
You can customize some common error messages when creating a string schema.
const name = z.string({
required_error: "Name is required",
invalid_type_error: "Name must be a string",
});
When using validation methods, you can pass in an additional argument to provide a custom error message.
z.string().min(5, { message: "Must be 5 or more characters long" });
z.string().max(5, { message: "Must be 5 or fewer characters long" });
z.string().length(5, { message: "Must be exactly 5 characters long" });
z.string().email({ message: "Invalid email address" });
z.string().url({ message: "Invalid url" });
z.string().uuid({ message: "Invalid UUID" });
z.string().startsWith("https://", { message: "Must provide secure URL" });
z.string().endsWith(".com", { message: "Only .com domains allowed" });
You can customize certain error messages when creating a number schema.
const age = z.number({
required_error: "Age is required",
invalid_type_error: "Age must be a number",
});
Zod includes a handful of number-specific validations.
z.number().gt(5);
z.number().gte(5); // alias .min(5)
z.number().lt(5);
z.number().lte(5); // alias .max(5)
z.number().int(); // value must be an integer
z.number().positive(); // > 0
z.number().nonnegative(); // >= 0
z.number().negative(); // < 0
z.number().nonpositive(); // <= 0
z.number().multipleOf(5); // Evenly divisible by 5. Alias .step(5)
Optionally, you can pass in a second argument to provide a custom error message.
z.number().lte(5, { message: "this👏is👏too👏big" });
You can customize certain error messages when creating a nan schema.
const isNaN = z.nan({
required_error: "isNaN is required",
invalid_type_error: "isNaN must be not a number",
});
You can customize certain error messages when creating a boolean schema.
const isActive = z.boolean({
required_error: "isActive is required",
invalid_type_error: "isActive must be a boolean",
});
Use z.date() to validate Date
instances.
z.date().safeParse(new Date()); // success: true
z.date().safeParse("2022-01-12T00:00:00.000Z"); // success: false
You can customize certain error messages when creating a date schema.
const myDateSchema = z.date({
required_error: "Please select a date and time",
invalid_type_error: "That's not a date!",
});
Zod provides a handful of date-specific validations.
z.date().min(new Date("1900-01-01"), { message: "Too old" });
z.date().max(new Date(), { message: "Too young!" });
Supporting date strings
To write a schema that accepts either a Date
or a date string, use z.preprocess
.
const dateSchema = z.preprocess((arg) => {
if (typeof arg == "string" || arg instanceof Date) return new Date(arg);
}, z.date());
type DateSchema = z.infer<typeof dateSchema>;
// type DateSchema = Date
dateSchema.safeParse(new Date("1/12/22")); // success: true
dateSchema.safeParse("2022-01-12T00:00:00.000Z"); // success: true
const FishEnum = z.enum(["Salmon", "Tuna", "Trout"]);
type FishEnum = z.infer<typeof FishEnum>;
// 'Salmon' | 'Tuna' | 'Trout'
z.enum
is a Zod-native way to declare a schema with a fixed set of allowable string values. Pass the array of values directly into z.enum()
. Alternatively, use as const
to define your enum values as a tuple of strings. See the const assertion docs for details.
const VALUES = ["Salmon", "Tuna", "Trout"] as const;
const FishEnum = z.enum(VALUES);
This is not allowed, since Zod isn't able to infer the exact values of each element.
const fish = ["Salmon", "Tuna", "Trout"];
const FishEnum = z.enum(fish);
Autocompletion
To get autocompletion with a Zod enum, use the .enum
property of your schema:
FishEnum.enum.Salmon; // => autocompletes
FishEnum.enum;
/*
=> {
Salmon: "Salmon",
Tuna: "Tuna",
Trout: "Trout",
}
*/
You can also retrieve the list of options as a tuple with the .options
property:
FishEnum.options; // ["Salmon", "Tuna", "Trout"]);
Zod enums are the recommended approach to defining and validating enums. But if you need to validate against an enum from a third-party library (or you don't want to rewrite your existing enums) you can use z.nativeEnum()
.
Numeric enums
enum Fruits {
Apple,
Banana,
}
const FruitEnum = z.nativeEnum(Fruits);
type FruitEnum = z.infer<typeof FruitEnum>; // Fruits
FruitEnum.parse(Fruits.Apple); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(Fruits.Banana); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(0); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(1); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(3); // fails
String enums
enum Fruits {
Apple = "apple",
Banana = "banana",
Cantaloupe, // you can mix numerical and string enums
}
const FruitEnum = z.nativeEnum(Fruits);
type FruitEnum = z.infer<typeof FruitEnum>; // Fruits
FruitEnum.parse(Fruits.Apple); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(Fruits.Cantaloupe); // passes
FruitEnum.parse("apple"); // passes
FruitEnum.parse("banana"); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(0); // passes
FruitEnum.parse("Cantaloupe"); // fails
Const enums
The .nativeEnum()
function works for as const
objects as well. as const
required TypeScript 3.4+!
const Fruits = {
Apple: "apple",
Banana: "banana",
Cantaloupe: 3,
} as const;
const FruitEnum = z.nativeEnum(Fruits);
type FruitEnum = z.infer<typeof FruitEnum>; // "apple" | "banana" | 3
FruitEnum.parse("apple"); // passes
FruitEnum.parse("banana"); // passes
FruitEnum.parse(3); // passes
FruitEnum.parse("Cantaloupe"); // fails
You can access the underlying object with the .enum
property:
FruitEnum.enum.Apple; // "apple"
You can make any schema optional with z.optional()
. This wraps the schema in a ZodOptional
instance and returns the result.
const schema = z.optional(z.string());
schema.parse(undefined); // => returns undefined
type A = z.infer<typeof schema>; // string | undefined
For convenience, you can also call the .optional()
method on an existing schema.
const user = z.object({
username: z.string().optional(),
});
type C = z.infer<typeof user>; // { username?: string | undefined };
You can extract the wrapped schema from a ZodOptional
instance with .unwrap()
.
const stringSchema = z.string();
const optionalString = stringSchema.optional();
optionalString.unwrap() === stringSchema; // true
Similarly, you can create nullable types with z.nullable()
.
const nullableString = z.nullable(z.string());
nullableString.parse("asdf"); // => "asdf"
nullableString.parse(null); // => null
Or use the .nullable()
method.
const E = z.string().nullable(); // equivalent to D
type E = z.infer<typeof E>; // string | null
Extract the inner schema with .unwrap()
.
const stringSchema = z.string();
const nullableString = stringSchema.nullable();
nullableString.unwrap() === stringSchema; // true
// all properties are required by default
const Dog = z.object({
name: z.string(),
age: z.number(),
});
// extract the inferred type like this
type Dog = z.infer<typeof Dog>;
// equivalent to:
type Dog = {
name: string;
age: number;
};
Use .shape
to access the schemas for a particular key.
Dog.shape.name; // => string schema
Dog.shape.age; // => number schema
Use .key
to create a ZodEnum
schema from the keys of an object schema.
const keySchema = Dog.keyof();
keySchema; // ZodEnum<["name", "age"]>
You can add additional fields to an object schema with the .extend
method.
const DogWithBreed = Dog.extend({
breed: z.string(),
});
You can use .extend
to overwrite fields! Be careful with this power!
Equivalent to A.extend(B.shape)
.
const BaseTeacher = z.object({ students: z.array(z.string()) });
const HasID = z.object({ id: z.string() });
const Teacher = BaseTeacher.merge(HasID);
type Teacher = z.infer<typeof Teacher>; // => { students: string[], id: string }
If the two schemas share keys, the properties of B overrides the property of A. The returned schema also inherits the "unknownKeys" policy (strip/strict/passthrough) and the catchall schema of B.
Inspired by TypeScript's built-in Pick
and Omit
utility types, all Zod object schemas have .pick
and .omit
methods that return a modified version. Consider this Recipe schema:
const Recipe = z.object({
id: z.string(),
name: z.string(),
ingredients: z.array(z.string()),
});
To only keep certain keys, use .pick
.
const JustTheName = Recipe.pick({ name: true });
type JustTheName = z.infer<typeof JustTheName>;
// => { name: string }
To remove certain keys, use .omit
.
const NoIDRecipe = Recipe.omit({ id: true });
type NoIDRecipe = z.infer<typeof NoIDRecipe>;
// => { name: string, ingredients: string[] }
Inspired by the built-in TypeScript utility type Partial, the .partial
method makes all properties optional.
Starting from this object:
const user = z.object({
email: z.string()
username: z.string(),
});
// { email: string; username: string }
We can create a partial version:
const partialUser = user.partial();
// { email?: string | undefined; username?: string | undefined }
You can also specify which properties to make optional:
const optionalEmail = user.partial({
email: true,
});
/*
{
email?: string | undefined;
username: string
}
*/
The .partial
method is shallow — it only applies one level deep. There is also a "deep" version:
const user = z.object({
username: z.string(),
location: z.object({
latitude: z.number(),
longitude: z.number(),
}),
strings: z.array(z.object({ value: z.string() })),
});
const deepPartialUser = user.deepPartial();
/*
{
username?: string | undefined,
location?: {
latitude?: number | undefined;
longitude?: number | undefined;
} | undefined,
strings?: { value?: string}[]
}
*/
Important limitation: deep partials only work as expected in hierarchies of objects, arrays, and tuples.
By default Zod object schemas strip out unrecognized keys during parsing.
const person = z.object({
name: z.string(),
});
person.parse({
name: "bob dylan",
extraKey: 61,
});
// => { name: "bob dylan" }
// extraKey has been stripped
Instead, if you want to pass through unknown keys, use .passthrough()
.
person.passthrough().parse({
name: "bob dylan",
extraKey: 61,
});
// => { name: "bob dylan", extraKey: 61 }
By default Zod object schemas strip out unrecognized keys during parsing. You can disallow unknown keys with .strict()
. If there are any unknown keys in the input, Zod will throw an error.
const person = z
.object({
name: z.string(),
})
.strict();
person.parse({
name: "bob dylan",
extraKey: 61,
});
// => throws ZodError
You can use the .strip
method to reset an object schema to the default behavior (stripping unrecognized keys).
You can pass a "catchall" schema into an object schema. All unknown keys will be validated against it.
const person = z
.object({
name: z.string(),
})
.catchall(z.number());
person.parse({
name: "bob dylan",
validExtraKey: 61, // works fine
});
person.parse({
name: "bob dylan",
validExtraKey: false, // fails
});
// => throws ZodError
Using .catchall()
obviates .passthrough()
, .strip()
, or .strict()
. All keys are now considered "known".
const stringArray = z.array(z.string());
// equivalent
const stringArray = z.string().array();
Be careful with the .array()
method. It returns a new ZodArray
instance. This means the order in which you call methods matters. For instance:
z.string().optional().array(); // (string | undefined)[]
z.string().array().optional(); // string[] | undefined
Use .element
to access the schema for an element of the array.
stringArray.element; // => string schema
If you want to ensure that an array contains at least one element, use .nonempty()
.
const nonEmptyStrings = z.string().array().nonempty();
// the inferred type is now
// [string, ...string[]]
nonEmptyStrings.parse([]); // throws: "Array cannot be empty"
nonEmptyStrings.parse(["Ariana Grande"]); // passes
You can optionally specify a custom error message:
// optional custom error message
const nonEmptyStrings = z.string().array().nonempty({
message: "Can't be empty!",
});
z.string().array().min(5); // must contain 5 or more items
z.string().array().max(5); // must contain 5 or fewer items
z.string().array().length(5); // must contain 5 items exactly
Unlike .nonempty()
these methods do not change the inferred type.
Unlike arrays, tuples have a fixed number of elements and each element can have a different type.
const athleteSchema = z.tuple([
z.string(), // name
z.number(), // jersey number
z.object({
pointsScored: z.number(),
}), // statistics
]);
type Athlete = z.infer<typeof athleteSchema>;
// type Athlete = [string, number, { pointsScored: number }]
Zod includes a built-in z.union
method for composing "OR" types.
const stringOrNumber = z.union([z.string(), z.number()]);
stringOrNumber.parse("foo"); // passes
stringOrNumber.parse(14); // passes
Zod will test the input against each of the "options" in order and return the first value that validates successfully.
For convenience, you can also use the .or
method:
const stringOrNumber = z.string().or(z.number());
If the union consists of object schemas all identifiable by a common property, it is possible to use
the z.discriminatedUnion
method.
The advantage is in more efficient evaluation and more human friendly errors. With the basic union method the input is tested against each of the provided "options", and in the case of invalidity, issues for all the "options" are shown in the zod error. On the other hand, the discriminated union allows for selecting just one of the "options", testing against it, and showing only the issues related to this "option".
const item = z
.discriminatedUnion("type", [
z.object({ type: z.literal("a"), a: z.string() }),
z.object({ type: z.literal("b"), b: z.string() }),
])
.parse({ type: "a", a: "abc" });
Record schemas are used to validate types such as { [k: string]: number }
.
If you want to validate the values of an object against some schema but don't care about the keys, use z.record(valueType)
:
const NumberCache = z.record(z.number());
type NumberCache = z.infer<typeof NumberCache>;
// => { [k: string]: number }
This is particularly useful for storing or caching items by ID.
const userStore: UserStore = {};
userStore["77d2586b-9e8e-4ecf-8b21-ea7e0530eadd"] = {
name: "Carlotta",
}; // passes
userStore["77d2586b-9e8e-4ecf-8b21-ea7e0530eadd"] = {
whatever: "Ice cream sundae",
}; // TypeError
If you want to validate both the keys and the values, use
z.record(keyType, valueType)
:
const NoEmptyKeysSchema = z.record(z.string().min(1), z.number());
NoEmptyKeysSchema.parse({ count: 1 }); // => { 'count': 1 }
NoEmptyKeysSchema.parse({ "": 1 }); // fails
(Notice how when passing two arguments, valueType
is the second argument)
A note on numerical keys
While z.record(keyType, valueType)
is able to accept numerical key types and TypeScript's built-in Record type is Record<KeyType, ValueType>
, it's hard to represent the TypeScript type Record<number, any>
in Zod.
As it turns out, TypeScript's behavior surrounding [k: number]
is a little unintuitive:
const testMap: { [k: number]: string } = {
1: "one",
};
for (const key in testMap) {
console.log(`${key}: ${typeof key}`);
}
// prints: `1: string`
As you can see, JavaScript automatically casts all object keys to strings under the hood. Since Zod is trying to bridge the gap between static and runtime types, it doesn't make sense to provide a way of creating a record schema with numerical keys, since there's no such thing as a numerical key in runtime JavaScript.
const stringNumberMap = z.map(z.string(), z.number());
type StringNumberMap = z.infer<typeof stringNumberMap>;
// type StringNumberMap = Map<string, number>
const numberSet = z.set(z.number());
type NumberSet = z.infer<typeof numberSet>;
// type NumberSet = Set<number>
Set schemas can be further contrainted with the following utility methods.
z.set(z.string()).nonempty(); // must contain at least one item
z.set(z.string()).min(5); // must contain 5 or more items
z.set(z.string()).max(5); // must contain 5 or fewer items
z.set(z.string()).size(5); // must contain 5 items exactly
Intersections are useful for creating "logical AND" types. This is useful for intersecting two object types.
const Person = z.object({
name: z.string(),
});
const Employee = z.object({
role: z.string(),
});
const EmployedPerson = z.intersection(Person, Employee);
// equivalent to:
const EmployedPerson = Person.and(Employee);
Though in many cases, it is recommended to use A.merge(B)
to merge two objects. The .merge
method returns a new ZodObject
instance, whereas A.and(B)
returns a less useful ZodIntersection
instance that lacks common object methods like pick
and omit
.
const a = z.union([z.number(), z.string()]);
const b = z.union([z.number(), z.boolean()]);
const c = z.intersection(a, b);
type c = z.infer<typeof c>; // => number
You can define a recursive schema in Zod, but because of a limitation of TypeScript, their type can't be statically inferred. Instead you'll need to define the type definition manually, and provide it to Zod as a "type hint".
interface Category {
name: string;
subcategories: Category[];
}
// cast to z.ZodType<Category>
const Category: z.ZodType<Category> = z.lazy(() =>
z.object({
name: z.string(),
subcategories: z.array(Category),
})
);
Category.parse({
name: "People",
subcategories: [
{
name: "Politicians",
subcategories: [{ name: "Presidents", subcategories: [] }],
},
],
}); // passes
Unfortunately this code is a bit duplicative, since you're declaring the types twice: once in the interface and again in the Zod definition.
If you want to validate any JSON value, you can use the snippet below.
const literalSchema = z.union([z.string(), z.number(), z.boolean(), z.null()]);
type Literal = z.infer<typeof literalSchema>;
type Json = Literal | { [key: string]: Json } | Json[];
const jsonSchema: z.ZodType<Json> = z.lazy(() =>
z.union([literalSchema, z.array(jsonSchema), z.record(jsonSchema)])
);
jsonSchema.parse(data);
Thanks to ggoodman for suggesting this.
Despite supporting recursive schemas, passing cyclical data into Zod will cause an infinite loop.
const numberPromise = z.promise(z.number());
"Parsing" works a little differently with promise schemas. Validation happens in two parts:
- Zod synchronously checks that the input is an instance of Promise (i.e. an object with
.then
and.catch
methods.). - Zod uses
.then
to attach an additional validation step onto the existing Promise. You'll have to use.catch
on the returned Promise to handle validation failures.
numberPromise.parse("tuna");
// ZodError: Non-Promise type: string
numberPromise.parse(Promise.resolve("tuna"));
// => Promise<number>
const test = async () => {
await numberPromise.parse(Promise.resolve("tuna"));
// ZodError: Non-number type: string
await numberPromise.parse(Promise.resolve(3.14));
// => 3.14
};
You can use z.instanceof
to check that the input is an instance of a class. This is useful to validate inputs against classes that are exported from third-party libraries.
class Test {
name: string;
}
const TestSchema = z.instanceof(Test);
const blob: any = "whatever";
TestSchema.parse(new Test()); // passes
TestSchema.parse("blob"); // throws
Zod also lets you define "function schemas". This makes it easy to validate the inputs and outputs of a function without intermixing your validation code and "business logic".
You can create a function schema with z.function(args, returnType)
.
const myFunction = z.function();
type myFunction = z.infer<typeof myFunction>;
// => ()=>unknown
Define inputs and outputs.
const myFunction = z
.function()
.args(z.string(), z.number()) // accepts an arbitrary number of arguments
.returns(z.boolean());
type myFunction = z.infer<typeof myFunction>;
// => (arg0: string, arg1: number)=>boolean
Function schemas have an .implement()
method which accepts a function and returns a new function that automatically validates its inputs and outputs.
const trimmedLength = z
.function()
.args(z.string()) // accepts an arbitrary number of arguments
.returns(z.number())
.implement((x) => {
// TypeScript knows x is a string!
return x.trim().length;
});
trimmedLength("sandwich"); // => 8
trimmedLength(" asdf "); // => 4
If you only care about validating inputs, just don't call the .returns()
method. The output type will be inferred from the implementation.
You can use the special
z.void()
option if your function doesn't return anything. This will let Zod properly infer the type of void-returning functions. (Void-returning functions actually return undefined.)
const myFunction = z
.function()
.args(z.string())
.implement((arg) => {
return [arg.length]; //
});
myFunction; // (arg: string)=>number[]
Extract the input and output schemas from a function schema.
myFunction.parameters();
// => ZodTuple<[ZodString, ZodNumber]>
myFunction.returnType();
// => ZodBoolean
Typically Zod operates under a "parse then transform" paradigm. Zod validates the input first, then passes it through a chain of transformation functions. (For more information about transforms, read the .transform docs.)
But sometimes you want to apply some transform to the input before parsing happens. A common use case: type coercion. Zod enables this with the z.preprocess()
.
const castToString = z.preprocess((val) => String(val), z.string());
This returns a ZodEffects
instance. ZodEffects
is a wrapper class that contains all logic pertaining to preprocessing, refinements, and transforms.
All Zod schemas contain certain methods.
.parse(data: unknown): T
Given any Zod schema, you can call its .parse
method to check data
is valid. If it is, a value is returned with full type information! Otherwise, an error is thrown.
IMPORTANT: The value returned by
.parse
is a deep clone of the variable you passed in.
const stringSchema = z.string();
stringSchema.parse("fish"); // => returns "fish"
stringSchema.parse(12); // throws Error('Non-string type: number');
.parseAsync(data:unknown): Promise<T>
If you use asynchronous refinements or transforms (more on those later), you'll need to use .parseAsync
const stringSchema1 = z.string().refine(async (val) => val.length < 20);
const value1 = await stringSchema.parseAsync("hello"); // => hello
const stringSchema2 = z.string().refine(async (val) => val.length > 20);
const value2 = await stringSchema.parseAsync("hello"); // => throws
.safeParse(data:unknown): { success: true; data: T; } | { success: false; error: ZodError; }
If you don't want Zod to throw errors when validation fails, use .safeParse
. This method returns an object containing either the successfully parsed data or a ZodError instance containing detailed information about the validation problems.
stringSchema.safeParse(12);
// => { success: false; error: ZodError }
stringSchema.safeParse("billie");
// => { success: true; data: 'billie' }
The result is a discriminated union so you can handle errors very conveniently:
const result = stringSchema.safeParse("billie");
if (!result.success) {
// handle error then return
result.error;
} else {
// do something
result.data;
}
Alias:
.spa
An asynchronous version of safeParse
.
await stringSchema.safeParseAsync("billie");
For convenience, this has been aliased to .spa
:
await stringSchema.spa("billie");
.refine(validator: (data:T)=>any, params?: RefineParams)
Zod lets you provide custom validation logic via refinements. (For advanced features like creating multiple issues and customizing error codes, see .superRefine
.)
Zod was designed to mirror TypeScript as closely as possible. But there are many so-called "refinement types" you may wish to check for that can't be represented in TypeScript's type system. For instance: checking that a number is an integer or that a string is a valid email address.
For example, you can define a custom validation check on any Zod schema with .refine
:
const myString = z.string().refine((val) => val.length <= 255, {
message: "String can't be more than 255 characters",
});
⚠️ Refinement functions should not throw. Instead they should return a falsy value to signal failure.
As you can see, .refine
takes two arguments.
- The first is the validation function. This function takes one input (of type
T
— the inferred type of the schema) and returnsany
. Any truthy value will pass validation. (Prior to [email protected] the validation function had to return a boolean.) - The second argument accepts some options. You can use this to customize certain error-handling behavior:
type RefineParams = {
// override error message
message?: string;
// appended to error path
path?: (string | number)[];
// params object you can use to customize message
// in error map
params?: object;
};
For advanced cases, the second argument can also be a function that returns RefineParams
/
z.string().refine(
(val) => val.length > 10,
(val) => ({ message: `${val} is not more than 10 characters` })
);
const passwordForm = z
.object({
password: z.string(),
confirm: z.string(),
})
.refine((data) => data.password === data.confirm, {
message: "Passwords don't match",
path: ["confirm"], // path of error
})
.parse({ password: "asdf", confirm: "qwer" });
Because you provided a path
parameter, the resulting error will be:
ZodError {
issues: [{
"code": "custom",
"path": [ "confirm" ],
"message": "Passwords don't match"
}]
}
Refinements can also be async:
const userId = z.string().refine(async (id) => {
// verify that ID exists in database
return true;
});
⚠️ If you use async refinements, you must use the.parseAsync
method to parse data! Otherwise Zod will throw an error.
Transforms and refinements can be interleaved:
z.string()
.transform((val) => val.length)
.refine((val) => val > 25);
The .refine
method is actually syntactic sugar atop a more versatile (and verbose) method called superRefine
. Here's an example:
const Strings = z.array(z.string()).superRefine((val, ctx) => {
if (val.length > 3) {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.too_big,
maximum: 3,
type: "array",
inclusive: true,
message: "Too many items 😡",
});
}
if (val.length !== new Set(val).size) {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
message: `No duplicates allowed.`,
});
}
});
You can add as many issues as you like. If ctx.addIssue
is NOT called during the execution of the function, validation passes.
Normally refinements always create issues with a ZodIssueCode.custom
error code, but with superRefine
you can create any issue of any code. Each issue code is described in detail in the Error Handling guide: ERROR_HANDLING.md.
By default, parsing will continue even after a refinement check fails. For instance, if you chain together multiple refinements, they will all be executed. However, it may be desirable to abort early to prevent later refinements from being executed. To achieve this, pass the fatal
flag to ctx.addIssue
:
const Strings = z
.number()
.superRefine((val, ctx) => {
if (val < 10) {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
message: "foo",
fatal: true,
});
}
})
.superRefine((val, ctx) => {
if (val !== " ") {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
message: "bar",
});
}
});
To transform data after parsing, use the transform
method.
const stringToNumber = z.string().transform((val) => val.length);
stringToNumber.parse("string"); // => 6
⚠️ Transform functions must not throw. Make sure to use refinements before the transform or addIssue within the transform to make sure the input can be parsed by the transform.
Note that stringToNumber
above is an instance of the ZodEffects
subclass. It is NOT an instance of ZodString
. If you want to use the built-in methods of ZodString
(e.g. .email()
) you must apply those methods before any transforms.
const emailToDomain = z
.string()
.email()
.transform((val) => val.split("@")[1]);
emailToDomain.parse("[email protected]"); // => example.com
Similar to superRefine
, transform
can optionally take a ctx
. This allows you to simultaneously validate and transform the value, which can be simpler than chaining refine
and validate
. When calling ctx.addIssue
make sure to still return a value of the correct type otherwise the inferred type will include undefined
.
const Strings = z.string().transform((val, ctx) => {
const parsed = parseInt(val);
if (isNaN(parsed)) {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
message: "Not a number",
});
}
return parsed;
});
Transforms and refinements can be interleaved. These will be executed in the order they are declared.
z.string()
.transform((val) => val.toUpperCase())
.refine((val) => val.length > 15)
.transform((val) => `Hello ${val}`)
.refine((val) => val.indexOf("!") === -1);
Transforms can also be async.
const IdToUser = z
.string()
.uuid()
.transform(async (id) => {
return await getUserById(id);
});
⚠️ If your schema contains asynchronous transforms, you must use .parseAsync() or .safeParseAsync() to parse data. Otherwise Zod will throw an error.
You can use transforms to implement the concept of "default values" in Zod.
const stringWithDefault = z.string().default("tuna");
stringWithDefault.parse(undefined); // => "tuna"
Optionally, you can pass a function into .default
that will be re-executed whenever a default value needs to be generated:
const numberWithRandomDefault = z.number().default(Math.random);
numberWithRandomDefault.parse(undefined); // => 0.4413456736055323
numberWithRandomDefault.parse(undefined); // => 0.1871840107401901
numberWithRandomDefault.parse(undefined); // => 0.7223408162401552
A convenience method that returns an optional version of a schema.
const optionalString = z.string().optional(); // string | undefined
// equivalent to
z.optional(z.string());
A convenience method that returns a nullable version of a schema.
const nullableString = z.string().nullable(); // string | null
// equivalent to
z.nullable(z.string());
A convenience method that returns a "nullish" version of a schema. Nullish schemas will accept both undefined
and null
. Read more about the concept of "nullish" in the TypeScript 3.7 release notes.
const nullishString = z.string().nullish(); // string | null | undefined
// equivalent to
z.string().optional().nullable();
A convenience method that returns an array schema for the given type:
const nullableString = z.string().array(); // string[]
// equivalent to
z.array(z.string());
A convenience method for promise types:
const stringPromise = z.string().promise(); // Promise<string>
// equivalent to
z.promise(z.string());
A convenience method for union types.
z.string().or(z.number()); // string | number
// equivalent to
z.union([z.string(), z.number()]);
A convenience method for creating intersection types.
z.object({ name: z.string() }).and(z.object({ age: z.number() })); // { name: string } & { age: number }
// equivalent to
z.intersection(z.object({ name: z.string() }), z.object({ age: z.number() }));
.brand<T>() => ZodBranded<this, B>
TypeScript's type system is structural, which means that any two types that are structurally equivalent are considered the same.
type Cat = { name: string };
type Dog = { name: string };
const petCat = (cat: Cat) => {};
const fido: Dog = { name: "fido" };
petCat(fido); // works fine
In some cases, its can be desirable to simulate nominal typing inside TypeScript. For instance, you may wish to write a function that only accepts an input that has been validated by Zod. This can be achieved with branded types (AKA opaque types).
const Cat = z.object({ name: z.string }).brand<"Cat">();
type Cat = z.infer<typeof Cat>;
const petCat = (cat: Cat) => {};
// this works
const simba = Cat.parse({ name: "simba" });
petCat(simba);
// this doesn't
petCat({ name: "fido" });
Under the hood, this works by attaching a "brand" to the inferred type using an intersection type. This way, plain/unbranded data structures are no longer assignable to the inferred type of the schema.
const Cat = z.object({ name: z.string }).brand<"Cat">();
type Cat = z.infer<typeof Cat>;
// {name: string} & {[symbol]: "Cat"}
Note that branded types do not affect the runtime result of .parse
. It is a static-only construct.
You can extract the TypeScript type of any schema with z.infer<typeof mySchema>
.
const A = z.string();
type A = z.infer<typeof A>; // string
const u: A = 12; // TypeError
const u: A = "asdf"; // compiles
What about transforms?
In reality each Zod schema internally tracks two types: an input and an output. For most schemas (e.g. z.string()
) these two are the same. But once you add transforms into the mix, these two values can diverge. For instance z.string().transform(val => val.length)
has an input of string
and an output of number
.
You can separately extract the input and output types like so:
const stringToNumber = z.string().transform((val) => val.length);
// ⚠️ Important: z.infer returns the OUTPUT type!
type input = z.input<typeof stringToNumber>; // string
type output = z.output<typeof stringToNumber>; // number
// equivalent to z.output!
type inferred = z.infer<typeof stringToNumber>; // number
When attempting to write a functions that accepts a Zod schemas as an input, it's common to try something like this:
function makeSchemaOptional<T>(schema: z.ZodType<T>) {
return schema.optional();
}
This approach has some issues. The schema
variable in this function is typed as an instance of ZodType
, which is an abstract class that all Zod schemas inherit from. This approach loses type information, namely which subclass the input actually is.
const arg = makeSchemaOptional(z.string());
arg.unwrap();
A better approach is for the generate parameter to refer to the schema as a whole.
function makeSchemaOptional<T extends z.ZodTypeAny>(schema: T) {
return schema.optional();
}
ZodTypeAny
is just a shorthand forZodType<any, any, any>
, a type that is broad enough to match any Zod schema.
As you can see, schema
is now fully and properly typed.
const arg = makeSchemaOptional(z.string());
arg.unwrap(); // ZodString
The ZodType
class has three generic parameters.
class ZodType<
Output = any,
Def extends ZodTypeDef = ZodTypeDef,
Input = Output
> { ... }
By constraining these in your generic input, you can limit what schemas are allowable as inputs to your function:
function makeSchemaOptional<T extends z.ZodType<string>>(schema: T) {
return schema.optional();
}
makeSchemaOptional(z.string());
// works fine
makeSchemaOptional(z.number());
// Error: 'ZodNumber' is not assignable to parameter of type 'ZodType<string, ZodTypeDef, string>'
Zod provides a subclass of Error called ZodError
. ZodErrors contain an issues
array containing detailed information about the validation problems.
const data = z
.object({
name: z.string(),
})
.safeParse({ name: 12 });
if (!data.success) {
data.error.issues;
/* [
{
"code": "invalid_type",
"expected": "string",
"received": "number",
"path": [ "name" ],
"message": "Expected string, received number"
}
] */
}
For detailed information about the possible error codes and how to customize error messages, check out the dedicated error handling guide: ERROR_HANDLING.md
You can use the .format()
method to convert this error into a nested object.
const data = z
.object({
name: z.string(),
})
.safeParse({ name: 12 });
if (!data.success) {
const formatted = data.error.format();
/* {
name: { _errors: [ 'Expected string, received number' ] }
} */
formatted.name?._errors;
// => ["Expected string, received number"]
}
There are a handful of other widely-used validation libraries, but all of them have certain design limitations that make for a non-ideal developer experience.
https://github.com/hapijs/joi
Doesn't support static type inference 😕
https://github.com/jquense/yup
Yup is a full-featured library that was implemented first in vanilla JS, and later rewritten in TypeScript.
- Supports casting and transforms
- All object fields are optional by default
- Missing object methods: (partial, deepPartial)
- Missing promise schemas
- Missing function schemas
- Missing union & intersection schemas
https://github.com/gcanti/io-ts
io-ts is an excellent library by gcanti. The API of io-ts heavily inspired the design of Zod.
In our experience, io-ts prioritizes functional programming purity over developer experience in many cases. This is a valid and admirable design goal, but it makes io-ts particularly hard to integrate into an existing codebase with a more procedural or object-oriented bias. For instance, consider how to define an object with optional properties in io-ts:
import * as t from "io-ts";
const A = t.type({
foo: t.string,
});
const B = t.partial({
bar: t.number,
});
const C = t.intersection([A, B]);
type C = t.TypeOf<typeof C>;
// returns { foo: string; bar?: number | undefined }
You must define the required and optional props in separate object validators, pass the optionals through t.partial
(which marks all properties as optional), then combine them with t.intersection
.
Consider the equivalent in Zod:
const C = z.object({
foo: z.string(),
bar: z.number().optional(),
});
type C = z.infer<typeof C>;
// returns { foo: string; bar?: number | undefined }
This more declarative API makes schema definitions vastly more concise.
io-ts
also requires the use of gcanti's functional programming library fp-ts
to parse results and handle errors. This is another fantastic resource for developers looking to keep their codebase strictly functional. But depending on fp-ts
necessarily comes with a lot of intellectual overhead; a developer has to be familiar with functional programming concepts and the fp-ts
nomenclature to use the library.
- Supports codecs with serialization & deserialization transforms
- Supports branded types
- Supports advanced functional programming, higher-kinded types,
fp-ts
compatibility - Missing object methods: (pick, omit, partial, deepPartial, merge, extend)
- Missing nonempty arrays with proper typing (
[T, ...T[]]
) - Missing promise schemas
- Missing function schemas
https://github.com/pelotom/runtypes
Good type inference support, but limited options for object type masking (no .pick
, .omit
, .extend
, etc.). No support for Record
s (their Record
is equivalent to Zod's object
). They DO support branded and readonly types, which Zod does not.
- Supports "pattern matching": computed properties that distribute over unions
- Supports readonly types
- Missing object methods: (deepPartial, merge)
- Missing nonempty arrays with proper typing (
[T, ...T[]]
) - Missing promise schemas
- Missing error customization
https://github.com/sindresorhus/ow
Ow is focused on function input validation. It's a library that makes it easy to express complicated assert statements, but it doesn't let you parse untyped data. They support a much wider variety of types; Zod has a nearly one-to-one mapping with TypeScript's type system, whereas ow lets you validate several highly-specific types out of the box (e.g. int32Array
, see full list in their README).
If you want to validate function inputs, use function schemas in Zod! It's a much simpler approach that lets you reuse a function type declaration without repeating yourself (namely, copy-pasting a bunch of ow assertions at the beginning of every function). Also Zod lets you validate your return types as well, so you can be sure there won't be any unexpected data passed downstream.
View the changelog at CHANGELOG.md